SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Vladimir S. Aslanov
               aslanov_vs@mail.ru



THE DYNAMICS AND CONTROL OF
     VARIABLE STUCTURE
  AXIAL SATELLITE GYROSTAS

      Theoretical Mechanics Department
                 www.termech.ru

   Samara State Aerospace University, Russia
                  www.ssau.ru




                      2012
Statement of the problem
β€’ We study dynamics and control of an axial satellite gyrostat with variable structure and free of external
  torques.
β€’ Depending on the relationship of inertia moments the paper discusses three basic types of gyrostats:
  oblate, prolate and intermediate and the two boundary types: oblate-intermediate, prolate-intermediate.
β€’ During the motion of a satellite the inertia moments of the rotor change slowly in time, which may be
  related to the deployment of solar panels, solar sails and other constructions. In this case, the satellite
  gyrostat can take place all the types from prolate to oblate or vice versa.




 The dynamics of a rotating body studied famous mathematicians of all time as Euler, Cauchy, Jacobi, Poinsot,
 Lagrange and Kovalevskaya. The research of the dynamics of rotating bodies is very important for numerous
 applications such as the dynamics of satellite-gyrostat and spacecraft. In this area we note the papers
 scientists as Rumyantsev, Sarychev, Wittenburg, Cochran, Hall, Rand, Hughes, Kinsey, Elipe and Lanchares ,
 Kuang,Tong et al.
                                                                                                                2
Statement of the problem

The purpose of this report is to find the control for the satellite gyrostat. The
control law should allow keeping a stable motion in the vicinity of the equilibrium
position for slowly changing of the rotor inertia moments in time. The main idea
of ​the stabilization method is conservation of the stable position by selecting the
internal torque.

We solve the following tasks:

β€’ The dynamics of the satellite is described by using ordinary differential
equations with Serret-Andoyer canonical variables.
β€’ The equations of motion have a simple dimensionless form and contain a small
parameter.
β€’ For undisturbed motion, when the inertia moments of the satellite gyrostat aren’t
changed and the internal torque is equal to zero the stationary solutions are
found, and their stability is studied.
β€’ For disturbed motion of the gyrostat with variable structure the control law
obtained on the basis of the stationary solutions.
β€’ Several numerical simulations are given to confirm effectiveness of the founded
control law.
                                                                                  3
The motion equations
The equations of the motion for the angular momentum variables of an axial gyrostat with
zero external torque may be written as

                           dh1    I 2 I3                                dh2       I3        IP           h3
                                           h2 h3 ,                                               h1 ha      ,
                           dt       I 2 I3                               dt            I3                IP
                                                                                                                             (1)
                           dh3     IP        I2            h2           dha
                                                  h1 ha       ,                 ο€₯
                                                                                ga
                           dt           I2                 IP            dt

 where ei are principal axes;                ο€₯
                                             ga   is the torque applied by P on R about e1;

    ha=IS(       S+    1)   is the angular momentum of R about e1;
    h1=I1       1+Is   s    is the angular momentum of P+R about e1;
    hi=Ii   i   are the angular momentum of P+R about ei (i=2,3);

    Ii are the moments of inertia of P+R about ei

     i   are the angular velocities of P about ei;                s   is the angular velocity of R about e1 relative to P.
    IP=I1 - IS is the moment of inertia of P about e1;
    Is is the moment of inertia of R about e1;
    IR is the moment of inertia of R about e2, e3                                                                                  4
The motion equations
The equations of the motion can be simplified by using two canonical Serret-Andoyer
(S-A) variables: l, L (Figure 1). Using the change of variables

                 h1     L, h2          G2    L2 sin l ,     h3         G2   L2 cos l                         (2)


We obtain the equations of the motion in terms of the S-A variables


 dl    1               1
          L ha           L a b (b a ) cos 2l ,
 dt    IP              2
 dL     1
            (b a) G 2          L2 sin 2l ,                       (3)
 dt    2I P
 dha
       ga
  dt
              IP        IP
where a          , b       .                              (4)
              I2        I3

Assume that     I2     I3 , b a                           (5)
                                                                                 Fig. 1 The axial gyrostat         5
The motion equations
The transformation of the Equations (3) to a dimensionless form is obtained by using four
parameters:           L      ha       G         ο€₯
                                               ga I p
                    s       , d        ,        t        , ga       2
                                                                            abs s   1   (6)
                        G          G                Ip          G
The change of variables (6) leads to the equivalent set of dimensionless equations
                  dl        s
                      s d      a b (b a) cos 2l ,
                  d         2
                  ds 1
                        (b a) 1 s 2 sin 2l ,                                            (7)
                  d   2
                  d d
                         ga
                    d
Let us assume the inertia moments of the axisymmetric rotor R about e1, e2, e3 are
continuous functions of the dimensionless time
                                                                                        (8)
                                           IS       I S ( ), I R        IR ( )
A separate study is showed that the form of the motion Equations (7) doesn’t change in this case.
We assume the derivative of the rotor inertia moments and the internal torque by small
                                                dI S dI R
                                                    ,     , ga          O                (9)
                                                d d
where is a small parameter.                                                                     6
The undisturbed motion
At Ξ΅=0 the disturbed Equations are reduced to an undisturbed canonical system
           H             s
     l             s d       a b       (b a ) cos 2l ,
           s             2                                                           (10)
               H    1
     s                (b a ) 1 s 2 sin 2l
               l    2
     a, b, d   const

where H is Hamiltonian by
                             1 s2                             s2
                    H l, s             a b     (b a) cos 2l        sd   h   const.   (11)
                              4                               2

Solving the Eq. (11) with respect to cos2l, we get an equation of the phase trajectory:


                                          a b 2 s 2 4ds 4h a b                       (12)
                              cos 2l
                                                  1 s2 b a


                                                                                            7
The undisturbed motion

 Canonical Eq. (10) have four stationary solutions:


              cos 2l*    1,                          s*   d/ 1 b ,                    (13)
              cos 2l*         1,                     s*   d/ 1 a ,                    (14)
              cos 2l*     2 a b 2d / b a ,           s* 1,
                                                                                      (15)
              cos 2l*     2 a b 2d / b a ,           s*    1                          (16)


 Determined by the stability of the solutions.

 It’s proved12 that the stationary solution (14) is stable if   b 1 IP       I3
                                            and unstable if     b 1 IP       I3
                                                                                        (17)
                    the stationary solution (15) is stable if   a 1 IP      I2
                                            and unstable if     a    1 IP        I2
the stationary solutions (16) and (17) are unstable always.
                                                                                               8
The undisturbed motion
Let us give complete classification of all types gyrostats depending on the ratio of the
inertia moments:

  1. Oblate Gyrostat:                 Ip   I2   I3   b   a 1
  2. Oblate-Intermediate Gyrostat:    Ip   I2   I3   b   a 1
  3. Intermediate Gyrostat:           I2   Ip   I3   b 1 a
  4. Prolate-Intermediate Gyrostat:   I2   Ip   I3   b 1 a
  5. Prolate Gyrostat:                I2   I3   Ip   1 b   a



Gyrostats 1, 3 and 5 correspond to areas with the same
numbers in Figure 2.

Gyrostat 2 corresponds to the border
between areas 1 and 3 and Gyrostat 4 – to the border between
areas 3 and 5.


                                                               FIGURE 2. Partition of the parameter plane
                                                                                 a 1, b   1
                                                                                                            9
The undisturbed motion
Five gyrostat types determined by ratio of the inertia moments for different
                           kinematic conditions

#         Type          Subtype    Conditions        Kinematic conditions
                           a           IP>I2>I3           |d/(1-a)|<1
1        Oblate
                           b          (b>a>1)             |d/(1-a)|β‰₯1
         Oblate-               IP=I2>I3 (b>a=1)          |d/(1-a)|
2
      intermediate
                          a                               |d/(1-a)|β‰₯1
                                       I2>IP>I3
3     Intermediate        b                         |d/(1-a)|<1, |d/(1-b)|<1
                                      (b>1>a)
                          c                               |d/(1-b)|β‰₯1
     Intermediate-             I2>IP=I3 (b=1>a)          |d/(1-b)|
4
        prolate
                          a           I2>I3 >IP           |d/(1-b)|β‰₯1
5       Prolate
                          b           (1>b>a)             |d/(1-b)|<1

                                                                               10
Phase space: Oblate gyrostat
                      There are two types of the phase space when I p          I2     I3     b   a 1




      d                                                               d
If           1 (1a case) the critical points are defined as   If               1 (1b case)
     1 a                                                            1 a
          saddles:                                                 saddles:
                     ls          k , ss    d / (1 a)                                2 a b 2d
                          2                                            cos 2ls               , ss      sgn d
                                                                                       b a
          centers:                                                 centers:
                     lc       k , sc      d/ 1 b                          lc        k , sc   d/ 1 b

                                                                                                               11
Phase space: Oblate-intermediate (2), Intermediate (3.a)
       There is the same phase space for the oblate-intermediate and intermediate gyrostats




                                                                                             abs s     1




  Oblate-intermediate (case 2)                            Intermediate (case 3.a)

  IP    I2    I3 (b a 1)                                  I2      IP     I3 (b a 1), d / (1 a) 1
  Critical points                                              Critical points

        saddles                                                        saddles
                       2 a b 2d                                                     2 a b 2d
             cos 2ls            , ss     sgn d                            cos 2ls            , ss          sgn d
                          b a                                                          b a
        centers                                                        centers

             lc        k , sc   d/ 1 b                                     lc       k , sc    d/ 1 b
                                                                                                              12
Phase space: Intermediate gyrostat
                                 I2      IP     I3 (b 1 a)




Intermediate gyrostat (3b case) has two sets of the critical points for each type
                                              saddles
                2 a b 2d                                           2 a b 2d
     cos 2ls             , ss    sgn d                  cos 2ls             , ss   sgn d
                   b a                                                b a
                                              centers
    lc         k , sc   d/ 1 b                          lc        /2   k , sc   d/ 1 b
                                                                                           13
Phase space: Intermediate (3.c), Intermediate-prolate (4)
       There is the same phase space for the intermediate (3.c) and intermediate-prolate gyrostats




             Intermediate (3.c)                                     Intermediate-prolate (4)
  I2    IP     I3 (b a 1), d        b 1                             I2   IP       I3 (b 1 a)

  Critical points                                           Critical points

  saddles                                                   saddles
                       2 a b 2d                                          2 a b 2d
             cos 2ls            , ss      sgn d               cos 2ls             , ss         sgn d
                          b a                                               b a
  centers                                                  centers

              lc       k , sc   d/ 1 b                         lc        k , sc    d/ 1 b
                                                                                                       14
Phase space: Prolate gyrostat

               There are two types of the phase space when I 2     I3      I P (1 b a)




                                d                                                    d
Critical points for 5a case            1            Critical points for 5b case           1
                               1 b                                                  1 b
saddles                                             saddles
                    2 a b 2d
          cos 2ls            , ss      sgn d                  ls   0, ss     d / (1 b)
                       b a
centers                                             centers

          lc         k , sc   d/ 1 a                          lc           k , sc   d/ 1 a
                2                                                  2
                                                                                              15
Variable moments of inertia
We study the stabilization of the gyrostat with the axisymmetric rotor. Rotor has a
variable inertia moments:
                                  I R = I R (t ), I S = I S (t )                (18)




   For example we can see
   deployment a solar sail




                                             IP              IP
  Equations (10) for time-varying a ( )           , b( )            have the same form:
                                           I2 ( )          I3 ( )
                       H            s
                  l          s d      a b       b a cos 2l
                       s            2
                         H   1
                 s             b a 1 s 2 sin 2l                                           (19)
                         l   2
                  d ' = ga
                                   where   ga   is internal torque (control)                     16
Phase space deformation of gyrostat with
                 variable moments of inertia
Here you can see phase space deformation when gyrostat changes it’s type from oblate
to prolate due to change (increase) in the inertia moments of the rotor.




IS ( )    a( )
IR ( )    b( )




                                                                                       17
Gyrostat stabilization
We claim that s s* while   I R = I R (t )   I S = I S (t )

                      β€’ To keep stable point for I P         I 2 (Oblate gyrostat)
                             d
                      s*          const                                       (20)
                           1 b

                       β€’ After differentiating d (1 b) s* we get a
                       control law for the internal torque :
                                                                 IP IR Β’
                                     d ' = g a = s* (1- b) ' =           s*   (21)
                                                                  I 32


                       β€’ To keep stable point for I 2        I P (Prolate gyrostat)
                             d
                       s*          const                                      (22)
                            1 a

                       β€’ After differentiating d (1 b) s* we get a
                       control law for the internal torque :
                                                                 IPIRΒ’
                                    d ' = g a = s* (1- a ) ' =     2
                                                                       s*     (23)
                                                                  I2
Numerical example
To confirm control efficiency we consider a numeric example.
Suppose that the rotor has deployable construction (solar array or solar sail).
This leads to time-dependent inertia moments of the rotor:
I R (t ) = I R 0 - k2t , I S (t ) = kS I R (t ) - gyrostat changes its type from prolate to oblate.


                Uncontrolled gyrostat with variable moments of inertia
                                           s0=0.5,   s0   = 0.2
                           s                                          Relative angular velocity       s




β€’ In this case gyrostat lose its orientation: the angle between e1 axis and angular
  momentum vector changes sufficiently.
β€’ Changes in inertia moments affect the angular velocities of R about e1 .
                                                                                                          19
Numerical example
         Controlled gyrostat with variable inertia moments (s0=0.5,               s0   = 0.2)
                                                         IPIRΒ’
                            d ' = g a = s* (1- a ) ' =     2
                                                               s*
                                                          I2
                s remains practically constant: s=s0=0.5 (|s-s0|<2 10-7)
            Control torque ga( )                                    Relative angular velocity   s




β€’ Angular velocities of R about e1 relative to P is decreased.
β€’ System preserves its state in phase space, despite to changes in the inertia moments
  of the rotor.
                                                                                                    20
Numerical example
β€’ Here we can see how internal torque affects to the angular velocities of the gyrostat
  with variable inertia moments. Uncontrolled gyrostat has oscillations in angular
  velocities that can cause unwanted high accelerations of the gyrostat.

β€’ The angular velocities of the controlled gyrostat are monotonic functions of   and we
  can expect that small accelerations.

                                Platform angular velocities

      Case 1: Uncontrolled gyrostat                     Case 2: Controlled gyrostat


                                                          2




                 2

     1                                                    1




         3


                                                           3




                                                                                          21
Conclusion

1. The dynamics of the dual-spin gyrostat spacecraft is described by using
   ordinary differential equations with Serret-Andoyer canonical variables.
2. The equations of motion have a simple dimensionless form and contain a small
   parameter.
3. For undisturbed motion the stationary solutions are found, and their stability is
   studied for the all the types of the gyrostats.
4. For disturbed motion of the gyrostat with variable structure the control law
   obtained on the basis of the stationary solutions.
5. It’s shown that uncontrolled gyrostat satellite can lose its axis orientation and
   because of change in moments of inertia of the rotor.
6. The oscillations of the angular velocities and accelerations of the gyrostat
   accompany changes in moments of inertia of the rotor.
7. Obtained internal torque keeps axis orientation of the gyrostat and get angular
   velocities and accelerations monotonic functions of time.




                                                                                       22
References
[1] Cochran, J. E. Shu, P.-H. and Rew, S. D. β€œAttitude Motion of Asymmetric Dual-Spin Spacecraft”
Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, V. 5, n 1, 1982, pp. 37-42.
[2] Hall, C. D. and Rand, R. H.: β€œSpinup Dynamics of Axial Dual-Spin Spacecraft” Journal of Guidance,
Control, and Dynamics. V. 17, n. 1, 1994, pp. 30-37.
[3] Hall C.D. β€œEscape from gyrostat trap states” J. Guidance Control Dyn. V. 21. 1998. pp. 421-426.
[4] A. Elipe and Lanchares β€œExact solution of a triaxial gyrostat with one rotor” Celestial Mechanics and
Dynamical Astronomy V. 101 (1-2). 2008. pp. 49-68.
[5] Lanchares, V., IΓ±arrea, M., Salas, J.P. β€œSpin rotor stabilization of a dual-spin spacecraft with time
dependent moments of inertia” Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 8. 1998. pp. 609-617.
[6] Hughes, P.C. β€œSpacecraft Attitude Dynamics” Wiley, New York, 1986.
[7] Kinsey K.J., Mingori D.L., Rand R.H. β€œNon-linear control of dual-spin spacecraft during despin
through precession phase lock” J. Guidance Control Dyn. 19, 1996, 60-67.
[8] Kane,T.R. β€œSolution of the Equations of rotational motion for a class of torque-free gyrostats” AIAA
Journal. V. 8. n 6. 1970. pp. 1141-1143.
[9] El-Gohary, A. I. β€œOn the stability of an equilibrium position and rotational motion of a gyrostat” Mech.
Res. Comm. 24. 1997. pp. 457-462.

                                                                                                            23
References
[10] Neishtadt A.I., Pivovarov M.L. β€œSeparatrix crossing in the dynamics of a dual-spin satellite” J. of
Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 64. 2000. pp. 741-746.
[11] Aslanov, V. S., Doroshin, A.V. β€œChaotic dynamics of an unbalanced gyrostat” J. of Applied
Mathematics and Mechanics 74. 2010. pp. 524-535.
[12] Aslanov, V. S. β€œIntegrable cases in the dynamics of axial gyrostats and adiabatic invariants”
Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 68, Issue 1 (2012), Page 259-273 (DOI 10.1007/s11071-011-0225-x).
[13] Aslanov, V. S. β€œDynamics of free dual-spin spacecraft” Engineering Letters (International
Association of Engineers). 19. 2011. pp. 271–278.
[14] Sarychev, V. A., Guerman, A. D., and Paglione, P. β€œThe Influence of Constant Torque on Equilibria of
Satellite in Circular Orbit” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 87, No. 3, 2003.
[15] J. Wittenburg Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies. B.G. Teubner Stuttgard, 1977.
[16] V. A. Sarychev and S. A. Mirer β€œRelative equilibria of a gyrostat satellite with internal angular
momentum along aprincipal axis” Acta Astronautica, 49(11). 2001. pp. 641–644.
[17] Rumyantsev V. V. β€œOn the Lyapunov’s methods in the study of stability of motions of rigid bodies
with fluid-filled cavities” Adv. Appl. Mech. 8. 1964. pp. 183-232.
[18] Serret, J.A., β€œMe moiresurl'emploi de la me thode de la variation des arbitrairesdans theorie des
mouvementsde rotations”. Memoires de l’Academie des sciences de Paris, Vol. 35, 1866, pp. 585-616.
[19] Andoyer H. β€œCours de Mechanique Celeste” Vol. 1, Gauthier-Villars. 1923.

                                                                                                           24

More Related Content

PPTX
Dynamics of Satellite With a Tether System
PDF
Talk spinoam photon
PDF
Existence of Hopf-Bifurcations on the Nonlinear FKN Model
Β 
PDF
Convolution Theorem for Canonical Cosine Transform and Their Properties
PDF
N. Bilic - Supersymmetric Dark Energy
PDF
Ip entrance test paper 1
PDF
Dimen
PDF
On gradient Ricci solitons
Dynamics of Satellite With a Tether System
Talk spinoam photon
Existence of Hopf-Bifurcations on the Nonlinear FKN Model
Β 
Convolution Theorem for Canonical Cosine Transform and Their Properties
N. Bilic - Supersymmetric Dark Energy
Ip entrance test paper 1
Dimen
On gradient Ricci solitons

What's hot (19)

PDF
IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineerin...
PPTX
Speech waves in tube and filters
PDF
Fieldtheoryhighlights2015 setab 28122020verdisplay_typocorrected
PDF
EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE OR NEW PRINCIPLE OF INERTIA?/ΒΏPRINCIPIO DE EQUIVALENCIA...
PDF
IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineerin...
PDF
Physics test2011 1
PDF
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
PDF
International Journal of Engineering Inventions (IJEI),
KEY
Jets MET Atlas Jamboree 2011
PDF
MIMO Stability Margins
Β 
PDF
P2 Area Under A Graph Modul
PDF
IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineeri...
PDF
S. Duplij, Constraintless approach to singular theories, new brackets and mul...
PDF
Module 13 Gradient And Area Under A Graph
PDF
Fission rate and_time_of_higly_excited_nuclei
PDF
Lecture notes 02
PDF
Zontos___EP_410___Particle_Motion
PDF
D. Mladenov - On Integrable Systems in Cosmology
PDF
Gauge Invariance Of The Action Principle For Gauge Systems With Noncanonical ...
IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineerin...
Speech waves in tube and filters
Fieldtheoryhighlights2015 setab 28122020verdisplay_typocorrected
EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE OR NEW PRINCIPLE OF INERTIA?/ΒΏPRINCIPIO DE EQUIVALENCIA...
IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineerin...
Physics test2011 1
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
International Journal of Engineering Inventions (IJEI),
Jets MET Atlas Jamboree 2011
MIMO Stability Margins
Β 
P2 Area Under A Graph Modul
IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineeri...
S. Duplij, Constraintless approach to singular theories, new brackets and mul...
Module 13 Gradient And Area Under A Graph
Fission rate and_time_of_higly_excited_nuclei
Lecture notes 02
Zontos___EP_410___Particle_Motion
D. Mladenov - On Integrable Systems in Cosmology
Gauge Invariance Of The Action Principle For Gauge Systems With Noncanonical ...
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Satellite dynamic and control
PDF
Active Suspension System
PPTX
Mathematical models and analysis of the space tether systems motion
PDF
Quantum modes - Ion Cotaescu
PPTX
Tachyonic and Localy Equivalent Canonical Lagrangians - The Polynomial Case -
PPTX
Chaotic motions of tethered satellites with low thrust
PPTX
НаписаниС Π½Π°ΡƒΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠΈ Π½Π° английском языкС
PDF
The Removal of Large Space Debris Using Tethered Space Tug
PDF
Attitude Dynamics of Re-entry Vehicle
PDF
N. Bilic - "Hamiltonian Method in the Braneworld" 1/3
PPTX
Turbines
PPT
Basic Ray Theory
PPTX
Rocket science experiment for class iv
PDF
Non-equilibrium Green's Function Calculation of Optical Absorption in Nano Op...
PPTX
Aerospace engineering
PPT
Airplane
PDF
Multi-Stage Hybrid Rocket Design for Micro-Satellites Launch using Genetic Al...
PDF
Brief introduction to perturbation theory
PPT
Against Space
PPTX
Future inventions of aerospace engineering presentation
Satellite dynamic and control
Active Suspension System
Mathematical models and analysis of the space tether systems motion
Quantum modes - Ion Cotaescu
Tachyonic and Localy Equivalent Canonical Lagrangians - The Polynomial Case -
Chaotic motions of tethered satellites with low thrust
НаписаниС Π½Π°ΡƒΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠΈ Π½Π° английском языкС
The Removal of Large Space Debris Using Tethered Space Tug
Attitude Dynamics of Re-entry Vehicle
N. Bilic - "Hamiltonian Method in the Braneworld" 1/3
Turbines
Basic Ray Theory
Rocket science experiment for class iv
Non-equilibrium Green's Function Calculation of Optical Absorption in Nano Op...
Aerospace engineering
Airplane
Multi-Stage Hybrid Rocket Design for Micro-Satellites Launch using Genetic Al...
Brief introduction to perturbation theory
Against Space
Future inventions of aerospace engineering presentation
Ad

Similar to The Dynamics and Control of Axial Satellite Gyrostats of Variable Structure (20)

PDF
Gn2511881192
PDF
Gn2511881192
PDF
Modeling of Dynamics of Gyroscopic System
PDF
IJERD(www.ijerd.com)International Journal of Engineering Research and Develop...
PDF
www.ijerd.com
PDF
Dynamics eg260 l1
PDF
Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms for Finite Element Model Updating. Nt...
PDF
Structural design and non linear modeling of a highly stable
PDF
Chapter 17
PDF
Propagation of electromagnetic waves in weak anisotropic medum
PDF
10.1.1.115.1297
PDF
Lecture notes 06
PDF
Compendium
PDF
Chapter 20
PDF
Energy methods for damped systems
PPT
General Exam Prashanth 2012
PPT
Dynamics of multiple degree of freedom linear systems
PDF
IROS 2011 talk 1 (Filippo's file)
PPT
Simple Harmonic Motion
PPTX
Cm 3 centripetal force & acceleration (shared)
Gn2511881192
Gn2511881192
Modeling of Dynamics of Gyroscopic System
IJERD(www.ijerd.com)International Journal of Engineering Research and Develop...
www.ijerd.com
Dynamics eg260 l1
Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms for Finite Element Model Updating. Nt...
Structural design and non linear modeling of a highly stable
Chapter 17
Propagation of electromagnetic waves in weak anisotropic medum
10.1.1.115.1297
Lecture notes 06
Compendium
Chapter 20
Energy methods for damped systems
General Exam Prashanth 2012
Dynamics of multiple degree of freedom linear systems
IROS 2011 talk 1 (Filippo's file)
Simple Harmonic Motion
Cm 3 centripetal force & acceleration (shared)

More from Theoretical mechanics department (20)

PDF
ΠšΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ мусор
PDF
ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ SciPy
PDF
ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ NumPy
PDF
ΠœΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Π™ΠΎ-Π™ΠΎ
PDF
Python. ΠžΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚Π½ΠΎ-ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅
PDF
Python. ΠžΠ±Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ° ошибок
PDF
Python: Π²Π²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄
PDF
Python: ΠœΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΠΊΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ‹
PDF
ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ Python. Π€ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ
PDF
ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ языка ΠŸΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ½: Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΡ‹ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ…, ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹
PDF
Машинная Π°Ρ€ΠΈΡ„ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ°. CΡ‚Π°Π½Π΄Π°Ρ€Ρ‚ IEEE-754
PPTX
Docking with noncooperative spent orbital stage using probe-cone mechanism
PDF
Алгоритмы ΠΈ языки программирования
PDF
Deployers for nanosatellites
PPTX
CubeSat separation dynamics
PDF
οΏΌChaotic Behavior of a Passive Satellite During Towing by a Tether
PDF
ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ MATLAB. ЧислСнныС ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹
PPTX
Вранспортно-пусковой ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉΠ½Π΅Ρ€ для наноспутников Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π° 3U, 3U+
PPTX
On problems of active space debris removal using tethered towing
PDF
ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΉΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΡƒΡ€Π°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ
ΠšΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ мусор
ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ SciPy
ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ NumPy
ΠœΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Π™ΠΎ-Π™ΠΎ
Python. ΠžΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚Π½ΠΎ-ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅
Python. ΠžΠ±Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ° ошибок
Python: Π²Π²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄
Python: ΠœΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΠΊΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ‹
ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ Python. Π€ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ
ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ языка ΠŸΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ½: Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΡ‹ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ…, ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹
Машинная Π°Ρ€ΠΈΡ„ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ°. CΡ‚Π°Π½Π΄Π°Ρ€Ρ‚ IEEE-754
Docking with noncooperative spent orbital stage using probe-cone mechanism
Алгоритмы ΠΈ языки программирования
Deployers for nanosatellites
CubeSat separation dynamics
οΏΌChaotic Behavior of a Passive Satellite During Towing by a Tether
ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ MATLAB. ЧислСнныС ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹
Вранспортно-пусковой ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉΠ½Π΅Ρ€ для наноспутников Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π° 3U, 3U+
On problems of active space debris removal using tethered towing
ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΉΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΡƒΡ€Π°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PPT
β€œAI and Expert System Decision Support & Business Intelligence Systems”
PDF
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
PDF
Chapter 3 Spatial Domain Image Processing.pdf
PPTX
20250228 LYD VKU AI Blended-Learning.pptx
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
PDF
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
PPT
Teaching material agriculture food technology
PDF
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
PDF
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
Β 
PDF
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
PDF
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
PPTX
Big Data Technologies - Introduction.pptx
PPTX
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
PDF
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
PDF
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
Β 
PDF
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
PDF
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
β€œAI and Expert System Decision Support & Business Intelligence Systems”
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
Chapter 3 Spatial Domain Image Processing.pdf
20250228 LYD VKU AI Blended-Learning.pptx
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
Teaching material agriculture food technology
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
Β 
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
Big Data Technologies - Introduction.pptx
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
Β 
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf

The Dynamics and Control of Axial Satellite Gyrostats of Variable Structure

  • 1. Vladimir S. Aslanov aslanov_vs@mail.ru THE DYNAMICS AND CONTROL OF VARIABLE STUCTURE AXIAL SATELLITE GYROSTAS Theoretical Mechanics Department www.termech.ru Samara State Aerospace University, Russia www.ssau.ru 2012
  • 2. Statement of the problem β€’ We study dynamics and control of an axial satellite gyrostat with variable structure and free of external torques. β€’ Depending on the relationship of inertia moments the paper discusses three basic types of gyrostats: oblate, prolate and intermediate and the two boundary types: oblate-intermediate, prolate-intermediate. β€’ During the motion of a satellite the inertia moments of the rotor change slowly in time, which may be related to the deployment of solar panels, solar sails and other constructions. In this case, the satellite gyrostat can take place all the types from prolate to oblate or vice versa. The dynamics of a rotating body studied famous mathematicians of all time as Euler, Cauchy, Jacobi, Poinsot, Lagrange and Kovalevskaya. The research of the dynamics of rotating bodies is very important for numerous applications such as the dynamics of satellite-gyrostat and spacecraft. In this area we note the papers scientists as Rumyantsev, Sarychev, Wittenburg, Cochran, Hall, Rand, Hughes, Kinsey, Elipe and Lanchares , Kuang,Tong et al. 2
  • 3. Statement of the problem The purpose of this report is to find the control for the satellite gyrostat. The control law should allow keeping a stable motion in the vicinity of the equilibrium position for slowly changing of the rotor inertia moments in time. The main idea of ​the stabilization method is conservation of the stable position by selecting the internal torque. We solve the following tasks: β€’ The dynamics of the satellite is described by using ordinary differential equations with Serret-Andoyer canonical variables. β€’ The equations of motion have a simple dimensionless form and contain a small parameter. β€’ For undisturbed motion, when the inertia moments of the satellite gyrostat aren’t changed and the internal torque is equal to zero the stationary solutions are found, and their stability is studied. β€’ For disturbed motion of the gyrostat with variable structure the control law obtained on the basis of the stationary solutions. β€’ Several numerical simulations are given to confirm effectiveness of the founded control law. 3
  • 4. The motion equations The equations of the motion for the angular momentum variables of an axial gyrostat with zero external torque may be written as dh1 I 2 I3 dh2 I3 IP h3 h2 h3 , h1 ha , dt I 2 I3 dt I3 IP (1) dh3 IP I2 h2 dha h1 ha , ο€₯ ga dt I2 IP dt where ei are principal axes; ο€₯ ga is the torque applied by P on R about e1; ha=IS( S+ 1) is the angular momentum of R about e1; h1=I1 1+Is s is the angular momentum of P+R about e1; hi=Ii i are the angular momentum of P+R about ei (i=2,3); Ii are the moments of inertia of P+R about ei i are the angular velocities of P about ei; s is the angular velocity of R about e1 relative to P. IP=I1 - IS is the moment of inertia of P about e1; Is is the moment of inertia of R about e1; IR is the moment of inertia of R about e2, e3 4
  • 5. The motion equations The equations of the motion can be simplified by using two canonical Serret-Andoyer (S-A) variables: l, L (Figure 1). Using the change of variables h1 L, h2 G2 L2 sin l , h3 G2 L2 cos l (2) We obtain the equations of the motion in terms of the S-A variables dl 1 1 L ha L a b (b a ) cos 2l , dt IP 2 dL 1 (b a) G 2 L2 sin 2l , (3) dt 2I P dha ga dt IP IP where a , b . (4) I2 I3 Assume that I2 I3 , b a (5) Fig. 1 The axial gyrostat 5
  • 6. The motion equations The transformation of the Equations (3) to a dimensionless form is obtained by using four parameters: L ha G ο€₯ ga I p s , d , t , ga 2 abs s 1 (6) G G Ip G The change of variables (6) leads to the equivalent set of dimensionless equations dl s s d a b (b a) cos 2l , d 2 ds 1 (b a) 1 s 2 sin 2l , (7) d 2 d d ga d Let us assume the inertia moments of the axisymmetric rotor R about e1, e2, e3 are continuous functions of the dimensionless time (8) IS I S ( ), I R IR ( ) A separate study is showed that the form of the motion Equations (7) doesn’t change in this case. We assume the derivative of the rotor inertia moments and the internal torque by small dI S dI R , , ga O (9) d d where is a small parameter. 6
  • 7. The undisturbed motion At Ξ΅=0 the disturbed Equations are reduced to an undisturbed canonical system H s l s d a b (b a ) cos 2l , s 2 (10) H 1 s (b a ) 1 s 2 sin 2l l 2 a, b, d const where H is Hamiltonian by 1 s2 s2 H l, s a b (b a) cos 2l sd h const. (11) 4 2 Solving the Eq. (11) with respect to cos2l, we get an equation of the phase trajectory: a b 2 s 2 4ds 4h a b (12) cos 2l 1 s2 b a 7
  • 8. The undisturbed motion Canonical Eq. (10) have four stationary solutions: cos 2l* 1, s* d/ 1 b , (13) cos 2l* 1, s* d/ 1 a , (14) cos 2l* 2 a b 2d / b a , s* 1, (15) cos 2l* 2 a b 2d / b a , s* 1 (16) Determined by the stability of the solutions. It’s proved12 that the stationary solution (14) is stable if b 1 IP I3 and unstable if b 1 IP I3 (17) the stationary solution (15) is stable if a 1 IP I2 and unstable if a 1 IP I2 the stationary solutions (16) and (17) are unstable always. 8
  • 9. The undisturbed motion Let us give complete classification of all types gyrostats depending on the ratio of the inertia moments: 1. Oblate Gyrostat: Ip I2 I3 b a 1 2. Oblate-Intermediate Gyrostat: Ip I2 I3 b a 1 3. Intermediate Gyrostat: I2 Ip I3 b 1 a 4. Prolate-Intermediate Gyrostat: I2 Ip I3 b 1 a 5. Prolate Gyrostat: I2 I3 Ip 1 b a Gyrostats 1, 3 and 5 correspond to areas with the same numbers in Figure 2. Gyrostat 2 corresponds to the border between areas 1 and 3 and Gyrostat 4 – to the border between areas 3 and 5. FIGURE 2. Partition of the parameter plane a 1, b 1 9
  • 10. The undisturbed motion Five gyrostat types determined by ratio of the inertia moments for different kinematic conditions # Type Subtype Conditions Kinematic conditions a IP>I2>I3 |d/(1-a)|<1 1 Oblate b (b>a>1) |d/(1-a)|β‰₯1 Oblate- IP=I2>I3 (b>a=1) |d/(1-a)| 2 intermediate a |d/(1-a)|β‰₯1 I2>IP>I3 3 Intermediate b |d/(1-a)|<1, |d/(1-b)|<1 (b>1>a) c |d/(1-b)|β‰₯1 Intermediate- I2>IP=I3 (b=1>a) |d/(1-b)| 4 prolate a I2>I3 >IP |d/(1-b)|β‰₯1 5 Prolate b (1>b>a) |d/(1-b)|<1 10
  • 11. Phase space: Oblate gyrostat There are two types of the phase space when I p I2 I3 b a 1 d d If 1 (1a case) the critical points are defined as If 1 (1b case) 1 a 1 a saddles: saddles: ls k , ss d / (1 a) 2 a b 2d 2 cos 2ls , ss sgn d b a centers: centers: lc k , sc d/ 1 b lc k , sc d/ 1 b 11
  • 12. Phase space: Oblate-intermediate (2), Intermediate (3.a) There is the same phase space for the oblate-intermediate and intermediate gyrostats abs s 1 Oblate-intermediate (case 2) Intermediate (case 3.a) IP I2 I3 (b a 1) I2 IP I3 (b a 1), d / (1 a) 1 Critical points Critical points saddles saddles 2 a b 2d 2 a b 2d cos 2ls , ss sgn d cos 2ls , ss sgn d b a b a centers centers lc k , sc d/ 1 b lc k , sc d/ 1 b 12
  • 13. Phase space: Intermediate gyrostat I2 IP I3 (b 1 a) Intermediate gyrostat (3b case) has two sets of the critical points for each type saddles 2 a b 2d 2 a b 2d cos 2ls , ss sgn d cos 2ls , ss sgn d b a b a centers lc k , sc d/ 1 b lc /2 k , sc d/ 1 b 13
  • 14. Phase space: Intermediate (3.c), Intermediate-prolate (4) There is the same phase space for the intermediate (3.c) and intermediate-prolate gyrostats Intermediate (3.c) Intermediate-prolate (4) I2 IP I3 (b a 1), d b 1 I2 IP I3 (b 1 a) Critical points Critical points saddles saddles 2 a b 2d 2 a b 2d cos 2ls , ss sgn d cos 2ls , ss sgn d b a b a centers centers lc k , sc d/ 1 b lc k , sc d/ 1 b 14
  • 15. Phase space: Prolate gyrostat There are two types of the phase space when I 2 I3 I P (1 b a) d d Critical points for 5a case 1 Critical points for 5b case 1 1 b 1 b saddles saddles 2 a b 2d cos 2ls , ss sgn d ls 0, ss d / (1 b) b a centers centers lc k , sc d/ 1 a lc k , sc d/ 1 a 2 2 15
  • 16. Variable moments of inertia We study the stabilization of the gyrostat with the axisymmetric rotor. Rotor has a variable inertia moments: I R = I R (t ), I S = I S (t ) (18) For example we can see deployment a solar sail IP IP Equations (10) for time-varying a ( ) , b( ) have the same form: I2 ( ) I3 ( ) H s l s d a b b a cos 2l s 2 H 1 s b a 1 s 2 sin 2l (19) l 2 d ' = ga where ga is internal torque (control) 16
  • 17. Phase space deformation of gyrostat with variable moments of inertia Here you can see phase space deformation when gyrostat changes it’s type from oblate to prolate due to change (increase) in the inertia moments of the rotor. IS ( ) a( ) IR ( ) b( ) 17
  • 18. Gyrostat stabilization We claim that s s* while I R = I R (t ) I S = I S (t ) β€’ To keep stable point for I P I 2 (Oblate gyrostat) d s* const (20) 1 b β€’ After differentiating d (1 b) s* we get a control law for the internal torque : IP IR Β’ d ' = g a = s* (1- b) ' = s* (21) I 32 β€’ To keep stable point for I 2 I P (Prolate gyrostat) d s* const (22) 1 a β€’ After differentiating d (1 b) s* we get a control law for the internal torque : IPIRΒ’ d ' = g a = s* (1- a ) ' = 2 s* (23) I2
  • 19. Numerical example To confirm control efficiency we consider a numeric example. Suppose that the rotor has deployable construction (solar array or solar sail). This leads to time-dependent inertia moments of the rotor: I R (t ) = I R 0 - k2t , I S (t ) = kS I R (t ) - gyrostat changes its type from prolate to oblate. Uncontrolled gyrostat with variable moments of inertia s0=0.5, s0 = 0.2 s Relative angular velocity s β€’ In this case gyrostat lose its orientation: the angle between e1 axis and angular momentum vector changes sufficiently. β€’ Changes in inertia moments affect the angular velocities of R about e1 . 19
  • 20. Numerical example Controlled gyrostat with variable inertia moments (s0=0.5, s0 = 0.2) IPIRΒ’ d ' = g a = s* (1- a ) ' = 2 s* I2 s remains practically constant: s=s0=0.5 (|s-s0|<2 10-7) Control torque ga( ) Relative angular velocity s β€’ Angular velocities of R about e1 relative to P is decreased. β€’ System preserves its state in phase space, despite to changes in the inertia moments of the rotor. 20
  • 21. Numerical example β€’ Here we can see how internal torque affects to the angular velocities of the gyrostat with variable inertia moments. Uncontrolled gyrostat has oscillations in angular velocities that can cause unwanted high accelerations of the gyrostat. β€’ The angular velocities of the controlled gyrostat are monotonic functions of and we can expect that small accelerations. Platform angular velocities Case 1: Uncontrolled gyrostat Case 2: Controlled gyrostat 2 2 1 1 3 3 21
  • 22. Conclusion 1. The dynamics of the dual-spin gyrostat spacecraft is described by using ordinary differential equations with Serret-Andoyer canonical variables. 2. The equations of motion have a simple dimensionless form and contain a small parameter. 3. For undisturbed motion the stationary solutions are found, and their stability is studied for the all the types of the gyrostats. 4. For disturbed motion of the gyrostat with variable structure the control law obtained on the basis of the stationary solutions. 5. It’s shown that uncontrolled gyrostat satellite can lose its axis orientation and because of change in moments of inertia of the rotor. 6. The oscillations of the angular velocities and accelerations of the gyrostat accompany changes in moments of inertia of the rotor. 7. Obtained internal torque keeps axis orientation of the gyrostat and get angular velocities and accelerations monotonic functions of time. 22
  • 23. References [1] Cochran, J. E. Shu, P.-H. and Rew, S. D. β€œAttitude Motion of Asymmetric Dual-Spin Spacecraft” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, V. 5, n 1, 1982, pp. 37-42. [2] Hall, C. D. and Rand, R. H.: β€œSpinup Dynamics of Axial Dual-Spin Spacecraft” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. V. 17, n. 1, 1994, pp. 30-37. [3] Hall C.D. β€œEscape from gyrostat trap states” J. Guidance Control Dyn. V. 21. 1998. pp. 421-426. [4] A. Elipe and Lanchares β€œExact solution of a triaxial gyrostat with one rotor” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy V. 101 (1-2). 2008. pp. 49-68. [5] Lanchares, V., IΓ±arrea, M., Salas, J.P. β€œSpin rotor stabilization of a dual-spin spacecraft with time dependent moments of inertia” Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 8. 1998. pp. 609-617. [6] Hughes, P.C. β€œSpacecraft Attitude Dynamics” Wiley, New York, 1986. [7] Kinsey K.J., Mingori D.L., Rand R.H. β€œNon-linear control of dual-spin spacecraft during despin through precession phase lock” J. Guidance Control Dyn. 19, 1996, 60-67. [8] Kane,T.R. β€œSolution of the Equations of rotational motion for a class of torque-free gyrostats” AIAA Journal. V. 8. n 6. 1970. pp. 1141-1143. [9] El-Gohary, A. I. β€œOn the stability of an equilibrium position and rotational motion of a gyrostat” Mech. Res. Comm. 24. 1997. pp. 457-462. 23
  • 24. References [10] Neishtadt A.I., Pivovarov M.L. β€œSeparatrix crossing in the dynamics of a dual-spin satellite” J. of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 64. 2000. pp. 741-746. [11] Aslanov, V. S., Doroshin, A.V. β€œChaotic dynamics of an unbalanced gyrostat” J. of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 74. 2010. pp. 524-535. [12] Aslanov, V. S. β€œIntegrable cases in the dynamics of axial gyrostats and adiabatic invariants” Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 68, Issue 1 (2012), Page 259-273 (DOI 10.1007/s11071-011-0225-x). [13] Aslanov, V. S. β€œDynamics of free dual-spin spacecraft” Engineering Letters (International Association of Engineers). 19. 2011. pp. 271–278. [14] Sarychev, V. A., Guerman, A. D., and Paglione, P. β€œThe Influence of Constant Torque on Equilibria of Satellite in Circular Orbit” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 87, No. 3, 2003. [15] J. Wittenburg Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies. B.G. Teubner Stuttgard, 1977. [16] V. A. Sarychev and S. A. Mirer β€œRelative equilibria of a gyrostat satellite with internal angular momentum along aprincipal axis” Acta Astronautica, 49(11). 2001. pp. 641–644. [17] Rumyantsev V. V. β€œOn the Lyapunov’s methods in the study of stability of motions of rigid bodies with fluid-filled cavities” Adv. Appl. Mech. 8. 1964. pp. 183-232. [18] Serret, J.A., β€œMe moiresurl'emploi de la me thode de la variation des arbitrairesdans theorie des mouvementsde rotations”. Memoires de l’Academie des sciences de Paris, Vol. 35, 1866, pp. 585-616. [19] Andoyer H. β€œCours de Mechanique Celeste” Vol. 1, Gauthier-Villars. 1923. 24