N. Bilic - "Hamiltonian Method in the Braneworld" 1/3

Hamiltonian Method in the
Braneworld
Neven Bilić
Ruđer Bošković Institute
Zagreb

Legendere Transformation
Basic Thermodynamics and fluid Mechanics
Lagrangian and Hamiltonian
Basic Cosmology
Lecture 1 – Preliminaries

Lecture 2 – Braneworld
Universe
Strings and Branes
Randal Sundrum Model
Braneworld Cosmology
AdS/CFT and Braneworld Holography

Lecture 3 – Applications
Quintessence and K-essence
DE/DM unification
Tachyon condensate in a Braneworld

Legendre Transformation
Consider an arbitrary smooth function f(x). We can define another
function g(u) such that
where the variables x and y (called conjugate variables) are related via
,
f g
y x
x u
(1)
Proof:
At an arbitrary point x0 the function f(x) can be locally represented by
where
0
0
x
f
u
x0 0 0( )f x u x g
( ) ( )f x g u xu

g depends on u0
0 tanuf
x-g x0
By the symmetry of (1) we can also write
0
0
u
g
x
u
where
Exercise No 1: Prove this using the geometry in the figure
Simple geometric meaning
0 0 0( )g u x u f

f
x
By variing x0 the function
f(x) may be regarded as
the envelope of tangents
The generalization to n dimensions is straightforward:
with
-g g is an implicit function of u
,i i
i i
f g
u x
x u
1 2 1 2
1
( , ,..., ) ( , ,..., )
n
n i i n
i
f x x x u x g u u u

Applications
1) Classical mechanics
( ) = ( )i j j i
j
p q p qH L ,i i
i i
p q
q p
L H
2) Thermodynamics
( , ) = ( , )F T V E S V TS ,
F E
S T
T S
F – Helmholz free energy, E – internal energy, S – entropy
1) Quantum firld theory
[ ] = [ ] ( ) ( )W J dxJ x x ( ) , ( )
( ) ( )
W
J x x
x J x
W – generating functional of connected Green’s functions
Γ – generating functional of 1-particle irreducible Green’s functions

Basic Thermodynamics
We will distinguish the grandcanonical from canonical ensemble
The conjugate variables:
V – volume p – pressure
S – entropy T – temperature
N – particle number μ – chemical potential
Canonical: particle number N fixed. Related potentials are
the Gibbs free energy G and internal energy E
Grandcanonical: chemical potential μ fixed. N is not conserved.
Related potentials are the grandcanonical thermodynamic potential
Ω=-pV and internal energy E

Canonical ensemble
( , ) ( , )G T p E S V TS pV
The Gibbs free energy G is related to the internal energy E via
Legendre transformation
The well known thermodynamic identities follow:
together with the conditions
, ,
G G
S V
T p
,
E E
T p
S V
(2)
(3)
dE TdS pdV
Exercise No 2: Derive (4) and (5) from (2) and (3)
(4)
dG SdT Vdp (5)
TDS equation

Canonical ensemble
The potentials G and E are related the Helmholz free energy F
via respective Legendre transformation,
( , ) ( , )F T V G T p pV
So that F
p
V
( , ) = ( , )F T V E S V TS
F
S
T

Grandcanonical ensemble
( , ) ( , )T E S N TS N
The grandcanonical thermodynamic potential Ω=-pV is related to the
internal energy E=ρV , entropy S=sV and particle number N=nV via
Legendre transformation
which may be expressed locally (dividing by V )
together with the conditions
, ,
p p
s n
T
(6)
(7)
( , ) ( , )p T Ts n s n
,T
s n

1p
d nd d
T T T
Two useful thermodynamic identities follow
Gibbs-Duhem relation
1s
dw Td dp
n n
Exercise No 3: Derive (9) and (10) from (6)-(8)
(9)
(10)
p
w
n
Introducing the specific enthalpy (or the specific heat content)
(8)
TDS equation

We will assume that matter is a perfect fluid
described by the energy-momentum tensor
u – fluid velocity
T – energy-momentum tensor
p – pressure
ρ – energy density
( )T p u u pg
Basic Fluid Mechanics

0=;T
0=;Tu
0,=)(3 pH
0)( , uppup 
,=,=,=,=3 ;,,; uuupupuuH 
The energy momentum conservation
yields, as its longitudinal part , the continuity equation
and, as its transverse part, the Euler equation
where
H – expansion (Hubble expansion rate in cosmology)
Exercise No 4: Derive (11) and (12)
(11)
(12)

Velocity field
It is convenient to parameterize the four-velocity uμ in terms of three-
velocity components. To do this, we use the projection operator
g t t
where tμ is the time translation unit vector . We split up
the vector uμ in two parts: one parallel with and the other orthogonal to tμ :
0 00t g g
( ) ,u t g t t u t u
yielding
where
Exercise No 5: Derive (13)
(13)

Isentropic and adiabatic fluid
A flow is said to be isentropic when the specific entropy s/n is constant,
i.e., when
and is said to be adiabatic when s/n is constant along the flow lines,
i.e., when
As a consequence of (14) and the thermodynamic identity (8)
(TdS equation) the Euler equation (12) simplifies to
(14)
In this case, we may introduce a scalar function φ such that
(15)
(16)
Exercise No 6: Derive (15) from (12) and (14)
which obviously solves (15)
,wu

,wuNB1: The solution (16) is the relativistic analogue of potential
flow in nonrelativistic fluid dynamics
L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, Pergamon, Oxford,1993.
NB2: The potential flow (16) implies the isentropic Euler equation (15) but
not the other way round. However if the fluid is isentropic and
irrotational, then equations (15) and (16) are equivalent. The fluid is said
to be irrotational if its vorticity vanishes. The vorticity is defined as
where
Vanishing vorticity, i.e., ωμν=0, implies
This equation is satisfied if and only if and the Euler equation
(15) is satisfied identically
,wu
A.H. Taub, Relativistic Fluid Mechanics, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 10 (1978) 301

The dream of all physicists is a comprehensive
fundamental theory, which is often in popular scientific
literature called the ‘’theory of everything’’. Of course,
nobody expects that this theory provides answers to all
the issues, for example, the cause of a cancer, how the
mind works, and so on. From the theory of everything
we only require to explain basic processes in nature.
Today most physicists share the following view of the
world: the laws of nature are unambiguously described
by the principle of some unique action (or Lagrangian)
that fully defines the vacuum, the spectrum of elementary
particles, forces and symmetries.
Lagrangian and Hamiltonian

The principle of least action
yields classical equations of motion
Classical trajectory
Classical description
1
x
2
1 2, ,
S
cl
classical
configuration
stable
metastable
4
det ( , )S d x g XL , ,X g
One can easily generalize this to more fields
with
Consider a single selfinteracting scalar field θ with with a general
action
where
0S
, ,i i iX g

[ ] [ ]
[ ]iS S
i
Z e d e
Quantum description
Through the action S we define a probability distribution
P
classical
configuration
Classical trajectory
x
Z = Partition function – path integral
cl
[ ]
[ ]
iS
i
e
P
Z

From the requirement δS=0 one finds the classical equations of motion
If L does not depend on θi, the associated current is conserved, i.e.
( ) ,ii X iJ = L
To each scalar field θi one can associate a current
where
( ); 0iJ
This current conservation law follows immediately from (17) and is
related to the shift symmetry
i i c
(17)
, ;i i
L L

The canonical Hamiltonian is defined through the usual Legendre
transformation that involves the conjugate variables θ,0 and π0
0 0
can , ,0 ,0 ,( , , ) = ( , , ), 1,2,3i i iH L
where
We shall use a covariant definition (de Donder-Weyl Hamiltonian)
, ,( , ) = ( , )H L
,
,
= =
L H
where
(18)
(19)
0 can
,0 0
,0
= =
L H
Hamiltonian

Historically, the covariant Hamiltonian was first introduced by De Donder
1930 and Weyl 1935 in the so called polysymplectic formalizm
Th. De Donder, Th´eorie Invariantive Du Calcul des Variations, Gaultier-
Villars & Cia., Paris, France (1930).
H. Weyl, Annals of Mathematics 36, 607 (1935)
Recent references
C. Cremaschini and M.Tessarotto, ``Manifest Covariant Hamiltonian Theory of
General Relativity,'‘ Appl. Phys. Res. 8, 60 (2016), arXiv:1609.04422
J. Struckmeier, A. Redelbach, Covariant Hamiltonian Field Theory, Int. J. Mod.
Phys. E17: 435-491, 2008, arXiv:0811.0508
It may be easily shown that the covariant definition of H coincides with
the energy density ρ in the field theoretical description of a perfect
relativistic fluid which we will discuss shortly

Examples:
1
( )
2
X VL
( )
1
U
X
H
1) The standard scalar field Lagrangian
2) The Born-Infeld (tachyon) Lagrangian
( ) 1U XL
1
( )
2
X VH

( )T p u u pg
, ,
2
2
det
X
S
T g
gg
L L
, ,X g
Field theoretical description of a fluid
This may be written in a perfect fluid form provided X>0
we define the energy momentum tensor
p L 2 XXL L
where
where we identify the velocity, pressure and energy density
X
X
LLwhere
Using a general single field Lagrangian
,
u
X
Exercise No 7: Prove ρ = H
4
det ( , )S d x g XL

Suppose for definitness that L depends on two fields Θ and Φ and
and their respective kinetic terms and
We introduce the canonical conjugate momentum fields
, ,
, ,
= 2 = 2Y Yg g
L L
L L
For timelike and we may also define the norms
= =g g
We shall assume that the dependence on kinetic terms can be separated,
i.e., that the Lagrangian can be expressed as
1 2( , , , ) = ( , , ) ( , , )X Y X YL L L
,,
Hamilton field equations
, ,X g , ,Y g
(20)

The corresponding energy momentum tensor
may be expressed as a sum of two perfect fluids
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2= ( ) ( ) ( )T p u u p u u p p g
with
(1) (1) (2) (2)
= 2 2 2X YT g g g
g
L
L L L L L
1 2= =u u
(2) (2) (2)
2 2= = 2Y Yp YL L L
(1) (1) (1)
1 1= = 2X Xp XL L L

It may be easily verified that the Hamiltonian equals to
the total energy density
1 2= 3 =TH L
, , , ,( , , , ) = ( , , , )H L
The field variables are constrained by
H is related to L through the Legendre transformation
, ,
, ,
= =
= =
H H
L L
(21)
(22)

Now we multiply the first and second equation by and ,
respectively, take a covariant divergence of the next two equations,
and use the obvious relations
2u1u
1= 3H
H H
1= 3H
H H
H LH L
We obtain a set of four 1st order Hamilton’s diff. equations
where
1 , 2 , 1 , 1 ,, , ,u u u u
1 1 ; 2 2 ;3 = 3 =H u H u are fluid expansions
and
Exercise No 8: Derive eqs. (23) from (21) and (22)
(23)

• General relativity – gravity
G = T
Matter determines the space-time geometry
Geometry determines the motion of matter
• Homogeneity and isotropy of space – approximate
property on very large scales (~Glyrs today)
• Fluctuations of matter and geometry in the early
Universe cause structure formation (stars, galaxies,
clusters ...)
Basic Cosmology

General Relativity – Gravity
g - metric tensor
R - Riemann curvature tensor
- cosmological constant
T - energy – momentum tensor
1
8
2
R g R T g

Homogeneity and isotropy of space
2
2 2 2 2 2
2
( )
1
dr
ds dt a t r d
kr
Cosmological principle
the curvature constant k takes on the values 1, 0, or -1,
for a closed, flat, or open universe, respectively.
– cosmological scale( )a t

• radiation
• dust
• vacuum
4
( 3 )
3
G
a p
; 0T 3(1 )w
a w p
Various kinds of cosmic fluids with different w
4
R R 3 1 3p w a
3
M 0 0p w a
k
0 open
0 flat
0 closed
Friedman equations
0
1p w a
2
2
8
3
a k G
a a
expansion rate
a
H
a

Density of Matter in Space
The best agreement with cosmologic
observations are obtained by the models with a
flat space
According to Einstein’s theory, a flat space
universe requires critical matter density cr today
cr 10-29 g/cm3
Ω= / cr ratio of the actual to the critical density
For a flat space Ω=1

From astronomical
observations:
luminous matter (stars,
galaxies, gas ...)
lum/ cr 0.5%
From the light element
abundances and comparison
with the Big Bang
nucleosynthesis:
baryonic matter(protons,
neutrons, nuclei) Bar/ cr 5%
Total matter density fraction ΩM= M/ cr 0.31
Accelerated expansion and comparison of the standard Big
Bang model with observations requires that the dark energy
density (vacuum energy) today ΩΛ= / cr = 0. 69%
What does the Universe consist of?

DM
DM
tot tot tot
0.05 0.26 0.69B
B
These fractions change with time but for a
spatially flat Universe the following always holds:
Density fractions of various kinds of matter today with
respect to the total density
tot crit

3 4 1/2
0( ) ( )M RH a H a a
Easy to calculate using the present observed fractions of
matter, radiation and vacuum energy.
For a spatially flat Universe from the first Friedmann
equation and energy conservation we have
2 1
0 100Gpc/s (14.5942Gyr) , 0.67H h h
The age of the Universe T can be calculated using
Age of the Universe
Exercise No 9: Calculate T using
ΩΛ=0.69, ΩM=0.31, ΩR=0.
1
0 0
T
da
T dt
aH

0.69
0.24
0.04
0.01
Dark nature of the Universe – Dark Matter
According to present recent observations (Planck Satellite
Mission):
• Out of that less then 5% is ordinary (“baryonic”)
• About 24% is Dark Matter
• About 69% is Dark Energy (Vacuum Energy)
More than 99%
of matter is not
luminous

Hot DM refers to low-mass neutral particles that are still
relativistic when galaxy-size masses ( ) are first
encompassed within the horizon. Hence, fluctuations on
galaxy scales are wiped out. Standard examples of hot
DM are neutrinos and majorons. They are still in
thermal equilibrium after the QCD deconfinement
transition, which took place at TQCD ≈ 150 MeV. Hot DM
particles have a cosmological number density
comparable with that of microwave background
photons, which implies an upper bound to their mass of
a few tens of eV.
 M12
10

Warm DM particles are just becoming nonrelativistic
when galaxy-size masses enter the horizon. Warm
DM particles interact much more weakly than
neutrinos. They decouple (i.e., their mean free path
first exceeds the horizon size) at T>>TQCD. As a
consequence, their mass is expected to be roughly
an order of magnitude larger, than hot DM particles.
Examples of warm DM are keV sterile neutrino,
axino, or gravitino in soft supersymmetry breaking
scenarios.

Cold DM particles are already nonrelativistic
when even globular cluster masses ( )
enter the horizon. Hence, their free path is of
no cosmological importance. In other words, all
cosmologically relevant fluctuations survive in
a universe dominated by cold DM. The two
main particle candidates for cold dark matter
are the lowest supersymmetric weakly
interacting massive particles (WIMPs) and the
axion.
 M6
10

Because gravity acts as an attractive force
between astrophysical objects we expect that
the expansion of the Universe will slowly
decelerate.
However, recent observations indicate that the
Universe expansion began to accelerate since
about 5 billion years ago.
Repulsive gravity?
Dark Energy

New term: Dark Energy – fluid with negative
pressure - generalization of the concept of vacuum
energy
Accelerated expansion 0
One possible explanation is the existence of a fluid
with negative pressure such that
and in the second Friedmann equation the universe
acceleration becomes positive
3 0p
a
cosmological constant vacuum energy density
with equation of state p=-ρ. Its negative pressure may
be responsible for accelerated expansion!

Problems with Λ
1) Fine tuning problem. The calculation of the vacuum energy
density in field theory of the Standard Model of particle
physics gives the value about 10120 times higher than the
value of Λ obtained from observations. One possible way out
is fine tuning: a rather unnatural assumption that all
interactions of the standard model of particle physics
somehow conspire to yield cancellation between various
large contributions to the vacuum energy resulting in a small
value of Λ , in agreement with observations
2) Coincidence problem. Why is this fine tuned value of Λ
such that DM and DE are comparable today, leaving one to
rely on anthropic arguments?

Another important property of DE is that its density does not
vary with time or very weakly depends on time. In contrast ,
the density of ordinary matter varies rapidly because of a
rapid volume expansion.
The rough picture is that in the early Universe when the
density of matter exceeded the density of DE the Universe
expansion was slowing down. In the course of evolution the
matter density decreases and when the DE density began to
dominate, the Universe began to accelerate.
Time dependence of the DE density

Most popular models of dark energy
• Cosmological constant – vacuum energy density.
Energy density does not vary with time.
• Quintessence – a scalar field with a canonical kinetic
term. Energy density varies with time.
• Phantom quintessence – a scalar field with a negative
kinetic term. Energy density varies with time.
• k-essence – a scalar field whose Lagrangian is a
general function of kinetic energy. Energy density varies
with time.
• Quartessence – a model of unifying of DE and DM.
Special subclass of k-essence. One of the popular
models is the so-called Chaplygin gas

Early Universe - Inflation
A short period of inflation follows – very rapid
expansion -
1025 times in 10-32 s.

Observations of the cosmic
microwave background radiation
(CMB) show that the Universe is
homogeneous and isotropic. The
problem arises because the
information about CMB radiation
arrive from distant regions of the
Universe which were not in a causal
contact at the moment when radiation
had been emitted – in contradiction
with the observational fact that the
measured temperature of radiation is
equal (up to the deviations of at most
about 10-5) in all directions of
observation.
The horizon problem.

The flatness problem
Observations of the average matter density,
expansion rate and fluctuations of the CMB
radiation show that the Universe is flat or with a
very small curvature today. In order to achieve
this, a “fine-tuning“ of the initial conditions
is needed, which is rather unnatural. The answer
is given by inflation:

The initial density perturbations
The question is how the initial deviations from
homogeneity of the density are formed having in mind that
they should be about 10-5 in order to yield today’s
structures (stars, galaxies, clusters). The answer is given
by inflation: perturbations of density are created as
quantum fluctuations of the inflaton field.
5
10 5
10= ,v Hd

Measuring CMB; the temperature map of the sky.
KT 2.723=
KT 100=
KT 200=

Angular (multipole) spectrum of the fluctuations of the CMB
(Planck 2013)

N. Bilic - "Hamiltonian Method in the Braneworld" 1/3

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to N. Bilic - "Hamiltonian Method in the Braneworld" 1/3 (20)

More from SEENET-MTP (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

N. Bilic - "Hamiltonian Method in the Braneworld" 1/3