SlideShare a Scribd company logo
New Information Technology and Civil Society Yanuar Nugroho, Ph.D Research Associate Suite 8.07 Harold Hankins Building [email_address] KEIS 7
Structure 30+ minutes presentation …. …  but … a LOT of stories from the field   questions/clarifications at ANY time during presentation (hopefully) some reflections (substantial/theoretical) at the end
Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is  new  in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is  new  in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
What is Civil society? The search for ‘polis’  ( Aristotle ) One of the cornerstones of vibrant societal sphere, providing voices for the disenfranchised and creating centres of influence outside the state and the economy  ( Anheier et al., 2002; Anheier et al., 2001; Deakin, 2001; Keane, 1998 ).  A sphere of ideas, values, institutions, organisations, networks, and individuals located between the family, the state, and the market  ( CCS-LSE, 2006 ) Global, network CS: CS that it is operating beyond the confines of national societies, polities, and economies. Not just CS that spills over borders and offers transnational opportunity for debates, but influences framework of global governance  ( Anheier et al., 2001a:11; Kaldor et al., 2004:2 ).
Civil Society Organisations CSOs : the entity of the sphere of social life which organises itself autonomously –not established and/or directly controlled by the state ( Deakin, 2001:4-8 ).  CSOs: the autonomous, democratic civil society entity, as expressed in organisations independent of the state and of corporate structure.  Gramsci ( 1971 ):  CS is not only the sphere where existing social order is grounded but also where new social order can be founded    a dialectic relationship: (1) the ideological agencies that are sustained by the state’s coercive apparatus that shape morals and culture; (2) CS has autonomy, more fundamental than the state, and hence is the basis upon which a state can be founded. CS is both shaping and being shaped –an agent of stabilisation, reproduction, and transformation
Civil Society Studies Yet, despite being prominent, theory and conceptualisation of civil society (and CSO) has been in constant debate and contestation and probably not been academically mature ( Anheier et al., 2001b; Kaldor et al., 2004 ).  But “debating the meaning of the term contributes to an open and self-reflexive civil society in the end” ( Kaldor, et al., 2004:2 ).  Since the 1990's interests in civil society studies have increased rapidly  General-theoretical ( like Anheier, 2003; Edwards, 2004; Hajnal, 2002; Hall, 1995; Kaldor, 2003; Keane, 1998; Wainwright, 2005 )  Specific-empirical ( such as, Anheier et al., 2002; Blumer, 1951; Edwards and Hulme, 1992; 1997; Hajnal, 2002 ).
CSO, or NGO? A clarification  Many use both terms interchangeably and put little attention on their difference and analyse them as a single entity. Yet, it may be an analytical mistake, since,  Civil society constitutes a vast array of associations, including trade unions, professional associations, religious groups, cultural and sports groups and traditional associations, many of which are informal organizations that are not registered. Nonetheless, despite the huge variety of different types of organisations that are found in the developing world, most of the funding from international sources for service provision is channelled through non-governmental organisations. The NGO sector in most developing countries is formally organised and often subject to certain government regulations, and has developed considerable capacity and experience in the delivery of development projects. For this reason, although it is important to keep the terms CSO and NGO analytically distinct, in practice the majority of CSOs involved in service provision are NGOs ( Clayton, 2000:1-2 )
‘ Advocacy ’ CSOs The most important agents in state-society relations are ‘social forces’ instead of social classes ( e.g. Migdal, 1994 ).  Various social forces (regardless class status) try to impose themselves on the political arena, prescribe others their goals and respond to existing problem    The relation between state and society can be understood as a continuous struggle for social control and domination involving  different groups and organisations.  This explains not only the social and political context of CSOs operation, but also the formation of social movement and the dynamics of civil society itself.  CSOs activism in promoting civic engagement, particularly at grassroots level, is inevitably political and transforming.  This area –democratisation, grassroots politics, and mobilisation– is one main area of CS activisms and CSOs are labelled as ‘political’ or ‘advocacy’ or ‘social movement CSO’.
‘ Development’ CSOs Another area: development, particularly orientated toward poverty reduction.  The success contribution of CSOs in reducing poverty is due mainly to their ‘rootedness’ (closeness) to the poor communities and to their effort to cooperate with them ( Barlow and Beeh, 1995 ).  Among many examples, CSOs not only assist the poor in rural area, but also help in empowerment through education and training, resettlement and transmigration and family health and other welfare matters.  In contemporary issues and concerns, some progressive CSOs also pursue women’s affairs, environment, human rights, and transfer technology to village communities.  CSOs working this area are often generally categorised as ‘development CSOs’.
Advocacy  vis-à-vis  Development Adopted and modified from Fakih (1996), Eldridge (1995) and Hope and Timmel (1988)
Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is  new  in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
Role of the new ICTs in CS The emergence of information technology, particularly the Internet, has given new impetus for the birth, or more precisely the reinvention, of networked civil society ( Hajnal, 2002 ).  That is, a networked of organisations, groups, and movement within civil society aiming at mainly widening participation in political decision making for ‘civic agendas’ such as development, protection of environment, defence of human rights, among many others.  There is a virtuous relationship between (global) civil society, civic agenda, and network society. (Global ) Civil Society Network Society Civic Agenda
Role of the new ICTs in CS It is through the facilitation in communication and participation via Internet technology that a network society is formed and thus strengthens global civil society ( Warkentin, 2001 ) Because the Internet’s inherent characteristics and transnational reach parallel (or correspond to) those of global civil society, the medium serves as both a logical and an effective tool for establishing and maintaining social connections that can contribute to global civil society… By increasing the ease with which people can establish and maintain relationships, share resources and information, and coordinate their activities, the Internet aids the process of building and maintaining the social bases of global civil society. ( Warkentin, 2001:33 ) Information technology provides both opportunities and constraints for actors participating in global civil society – in some ways expanding and in other ways contracting available means for interacting ( Warkentin, 2001 ).
Role of the new ICTs in CS Democratic participation, can be facilitated through multiple connections which ensure informed and interactive politics ( Sey and Castells, 2004: 363 ).  Historically, democracy meant having selected an élite of political representatives in political discussions. Then, having ‘direct’ democracy by involving the citizen in the decision making process became the ideal. With the help of information technology this ideal has become possible today although still considered problematic ( Coleman, 1999 ). The rise of the network society characterised by the appropriation of information technology has provided a renewed support for this vision (Richard, 1999) But, “it is only under the conditions of an autonomous citizenship and an open, participatory, formal political channel that the Internet may innovate the practice of politics” ( Sey and Castells, 2004:370 ).
Some ICT use in CS/CSOs Despite problem of access (esp. in developing countries) the Internet also has the potential to be  a ‘platform’ for organising strategic activities of CSOs (Surman and Reilly, 2003).  building and strengthening the identity of CSOs in cyber-civic space for social reform (Lim, 2002; 2003a; 2003d) through coalition building (Diani, 2003; Rucht, 1989).  by creating networks of opposition (Sey and Castells, 2004) which to some extent can be of important factor in leading to a creation of ‘insurgent space’ (Lim, 2002).  establishing collaboration, publishing (campaign), mobilisation and observation (watchdog activities) (Camacho, 2001; Lim, 2004a; Surman and Reilly, 2003).  Appropriation of ICT for social transformation would be optimum when it is addressed strategically towards movement development and organisational networks.
Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is  new  in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
Context of investigation Indonesia Multi-methods  268 CSOs were surveyed,  35 CSOs were interviewed, 15 case studies/observations, 3 workshops of 74 CSOs, 2 FG of 9 CSOs
Context of investigation
Pattern of Internet adoption Information Technology adoption Length of adoption (years) >10 (leaders) 5-10 (early majority) 3-5  (late majority) <3 (laggard) PC 21.64% 35.45% 24.25% 10.82% The Internet 5.97% 28.73% 26.87% 19.03% Estimated Variables Late majority and laggards (75.56%) Leaders and early majority (24.44%) Period of Internet use (years) <3; 3-5 5-10; >10 Age of the organisation (years) 0-1; 1-2; 2-5; 5-8; 8-10 >10 Number of staff (persons) <5; 6-10; 11-15 16-20; 21-25; >25 Annual turn over (IDR) <100 million; 100-500 million 500 million - 1billion;  1-2 billion;  >2 billion
Pattern of Internet adoption Parameter estimation: Issues and concerns of each category N=268;  Latent Class Analysis. BIC(LL)=5407.792; NPar=94;  L2=4214.830;  df=127;  p<0.0001; and  Class.Err=2.6%.
Access: typical problem?
Spectrum of use
Sequence of adoption Parameter estimation:  application used by each category N=268;  Latent class analysis. BIC(LL)=2024.3602;  NPar=90;  L2=983.6697;  df=131;  p<0.0001 and  Class.Err=4.35%
Drivers for adoption
Technological Substitution In what way has your organisation benefited from its use of the Internet? Score How the Internet is perceived as technological substitution. As … Building wider network with other organisation 1067 Apparatus for building network More effective management of organisation (back-office & internal communication) 970 Organisational management tool Cost saving in general 852 Advanced communication technology Better publication/communication of idea with public/other organisation 850 Publication media, Public relation tool  Collaborative project with other organisation(s) 765 Advanced collaborative instrument Fund-raising, including networking with donor 685 New way for fundraising Campaign/Opinion building 574 Means for campaigning and opinion building Other 41
Barriers to adoption
Negative aspects? Reasons for not  using the Internet What negative aspects have you been experiencing in using the Internet in your CSO?
Impacts of Internet adoption
Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is  new  in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
Instances of Internet use Empowering beneficiaries, spreading global awareness ( YDA ) Helping channel help for the most vulnerable ( JRS ) Networking advocacy ( INFID ) Research for civil society empowerment ( AKATIGA ) Shaping public views (e.g. on globalisation, as with  IGJ ) Campaigning alternative (more sustainable) lifestyle ( YPBB ) Campaigning for public policy change ( ECOSOC ) Mobilisation of direct action ( case of Pornography bill ) See more at  http://audentis.wordpress.com
Strategic use of the Internet Collaboration :  platform for wider collaboration not only within organisations but also between organisations. Among strategic collaboration work is  networking  and  coalition building . Mobilisation :  provide tools to help with mobilisation, including  campaigns  and urgent  calls for action  which can be facilitated by simple-but-powerful tools like emails and mailing lists. Empowerment and development :  provide alternative opinion and information; help spread awareness and invite real participation in various development programmes and agendas of improvement of livelihood. Research and publication :  data and information acquisition as research input (information in), and for dissemination of publication as research output (information out).   Advocacy and monitoring :  effective tool in helping to shape public opinion which is crucial for successful advocacy work like rallies, protests, or lobbying; a convenient means for monitoring development/watchdog activities in a certain field.
National network growth SNA shows evidence how the national network of Indonesian CSOs expands and grows over time –i.e. in 4 (four) social transition period in Indonesia.  Label shows the CSOs that were interviewed. Note that they represent  the ‘centre’, ‘periphery’ and ‘isolate’
International network growth SNA shows evidence how the  international network of Indonesian CSOs expands and grows over time – i.e. in 4 (four) social transition period in Indonesia.  This evidence challenges existing  proposition about the role and involvement of international CSO during the transition period to democracy in Indonesia (e.g. Uhlin, 2000)
Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is  new  in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is  new  in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
Revision of adoption stages
Revision of adoption stages
Internet for civic engagement
Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is  new  in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
Duality – not dualism
Lessons learned – CSO level Issues and concerns characterise the diffusion of the Internet in CSOs. Embedded values and interests of CS sector play a greater role in CSOs in the innovation process in organisations than implied by diffusion model ( Rogers, 1995; 2003 ).  CSOs seem to adopt new ICTs within a culture of collaboration and co-operation with other CSOs rather than a matter of competition    whether distinctive organisational cultures at least partially account for how perceived attributes of the Internet may affect its adoption in CSOs.  CSOs do not perceive the Internet as a source of competitive advantage (among their CSO peers) even though the technology offers capability to generate a high level of visibility for the organisation (for example, by means of WWW).
Lessons learned – CSO level Use of the Internet to encourage political participation should remain relevant. CSOs’ endeavour in shaping public perception and opinion can be facilitated by CSOs being active users on the Net.  It is argued that by becoming more active in the cyber-world –through creating an online persona (McCaughey and Ayers, 2003; Warkentin, 2001)—CSOs will engage in framing activities like online public opinion building, especially in the era when online media is increasingly gaining popularity. By shaping the way issues are conceptualised and understood, CSOs can often affect public opinion building in important ways.  As the adoption and use of the Internet potentially enables CSOs to play more important roles in society, the implementation of the technology has to become a more integral part of organisational strategy ( as suggested by, e.g. Galliers, 2004; 2007 ).  Lastly, while some areas for strategic use of the Internet in CSOs are mapped, CSOs strategically and politically facilitate the creation and maintenance of civil society’s “foundational network of social relations” ( Warkentin, 2001 ) in order to create ‘another better world’ ( Hajnal, 2002; Kaldor, 2003; Keane, 1998 ).
Lessons learned – SM level Since Internet use affects organisational identity (Castells, 1997), CSOs need to manifest its institutional development and broaden attempts to play its role in society by re-aligning resources, re-defining organisation’s strategy, tackling organisational issues (as also suggested by Clegg and Dunkerley, 1977; McLaughlin et al., 1999; Scott, 2003).  It is also with this in mind that CSOs’ members need to share a collective identity and role, develop mutual respect and increase trust among each other in order to maintain organisational cohesion.  As the use of the Internet in CSOs becomes more extensive, this can result in borders between organisations disappearing and sectors within civil society converging CSOs certainly need to anticipate this development and possibly prepare for new paradigms in their socio-political activism. Not only is the future changing, but the change itself can, and will, affect CSOs’ undertakings – in which the use of the Internet will play a mediating role.
Lessons learned – SM level Using the Internet to mobilise resources for action and pressures, the challenge is for CSOs to actually connect people and to exchange views across national boundaries on cross-cutting contemporary and global political, social and economic issues.  While the Internet has successfully facilitated ways of fostering reform and development agenda to the wider public, CSOs will need to remember that the essence of social movement is real engagement, not just information exchange (Juris, 2004).  For CSOs as a social movement, the most significant impact of Internet use might be its ability to interconnect organisations and networks of organisations to advance joint actions. This means an obvious challenge for CSOs to use the Internet which serves as a platform for the development of alternative discourses and strategies both in local and in global level, because this is exactly how the use of the Internet can affect the roles of CSOs in reshaping the socio-political life of society.  While Internet use can facilitate collective and collaborative work particularly when CSOs endeavour to influence public policy making, CSOs need to build their own capacity in order to be able to strategically use the technology.
Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is  new  in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
Transforming technology? As we saw, the transforming and unpredictable character of technological innovation makes any manageable form of cost-benefit analysis impossible. Does this mean that we have no way by which to judge it? No, because all such technology comes into existence and develops in a context, and that context as its broadest is the one to which reference has just been made –human nature and the human condition. It is a context, however, which bears on our assessment of technology not by providing a medium in which costs and benefits may be compared, but by providing us with the standard against which the ultimate value of technology must be measured.  ( Gordon Graham, Internet philosopher, 1999:169 )

More Related Content

PDF
The e(R)evolution will not be funded
PDF
Community governance and peacebuilding
PDF
Theorizing Citizenship in Late Modern ICT Societies
PPTX
Retos de la aplicación de las TIC a la participación en el ámbito local
PDF
Informational capabilities-the-missing-link-for-the-impact-of-ict-on-development
PDF
Soriano paper - 4-24 final
PPT
How Change Happens lecture IV: The Role of Activism
DOC
Citizenship, Democracy, and Professionalism
The e(R)evolution will not be funded
Community governance and peacebuilding
Theorizing Citizenship in Late Modern ICT Societies
Retos de la aplicación de las TIC a la participación en el ámbito local
Informational capabilities-the-missing-link-for-the-impact-of-ict-on-development
Soriano paper - 4-24 final
How Change Happens lecture IV: The Role of Activism
Citizenship, Democracy, and Professionalism

What's hot (18)

DOC
THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN PEACE BUILDING
DOC
The expressive turn of political participation in the digital age
PDF
Sense of Community Index 2(SCI-2)
PDF
Part 1 deep dive; the future role of civil society
PDF
A new relevant relationship between communities and local authorities through...
PDF
A New Vision Of Healthy Communities J Mc Knight 21st Century Map
PPTX
Community social work: what it is and why it matters
PDF
Paris report
PDF
Power-Preservation Corruption: A Threat to Internal Security of the Gambia
PDF
Ncercc Socialpedagogybook Chap03
PPTX
Idbe final
PDF
Contextualising Public (e)Participation in the Governance of the European Union
PPTX
Governance and Public Policy: Different Types of Democracy
ODP
Types of Community Development Workers
PDF
Expanded Presentation | Civic Shift: Action-Learning Lab for Systematic Civic...
PPTX
COMMUNITY MODELS AS TOOLS FOR SUSTAINABLE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA: FI...
PPTX
Introduction To Community Organizing
PDF
Democratic Values in Planning
THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN PEACE BUILDING
The expressive turn of political participation in the digital age
Sense of Community Index 2(SCI-2)
Part 1 deep dive; the future role of civil society
A new relevant relationship between communities and local authorities through...
A New Vision Of Healthy Communities J Mc Knight 21st Century Map
Community social work: what it is and why it matters
Paris report
Power-Preservation Corruption: A Threat to Internal Security of the Gambia
Ncercc Socialpedagogybook Chap03
Idbe final
Contextualising Public (e)Participation in the Governance of the European Union
Governance and Public Policy: Different Types of Democracy
Types of Community Development Workers
Expanded Presentation | Civic Shift: Action-Learning Lab for Systematic Civic...
COMMUNITY MODELS AS TOOLS FOR SUSTAINABLE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA: FI...
Introduction To Community Organizing
Democratic Values in Planning
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
Ginisty for Saudi Aramco Communication Symposium 2014
PDF
Research and Innovation at the University of Patras: The case of Innovation a...
PDF
How European Civil Society Organisations Strive for their Development Effecti...
PDF
Hemant Goswami on Tobacco Control
PDF
advancing20children20rights20-20child20friendly20guide
PPT
Uk Civil Society And The Recession Cc
PDF
Centre for Civil Society
PPT
Amos Zaindi - Role of Civil Society Actors in Strengthening Local Industries
PPT
Mobilizing for Development - Civil Society and ICTs in Southern Africa
PPT
Civil society baseline study 2011
PPT
CSF Funds: Opportunities for Civil Society Organisations
PPTX
Transperancy international india (tii)
PPT
Xu civil society organizations as catalysts in disaster response process-id12...
PDF
Civil Society Organisations for energy efficiency and sustainable transport
PPT
Serbian Civil Society Baseline Study 2011
PPT
Right To Information And Civil Society Organisations
PDF
Governance Role of Civil Society in SSR
PPT
University Industry Partnership For Innovations
PDF
21st Century Civil Society: Implications for Open Government
PPTX
Civil Society Organisations: achieving and maintaining scale
Ginisty for Saudi Aramco Communication Symposium 2014
Research and Innovation at the University of Patras: The case of Innovation a...
How European Civil Society Organisations Strive for their Development Effecti...
Hemant Goswami on Tobacco Control
advancing20children20rights20-20child20friendly20guide
Uk Civil Society And The Recession Cc
Centre for Civil Society
Amos Zaindi - Role of Civil Society Actors in Strengthening Local Industries
Mobilizing for Development - Civil Society and ICTs in Southern Africa
Civil society baseline study 2011
CSF Funds: Opportunities for Civil Society Organisations
Transperancy international india (tii)
Xu civil society organizations as catalysts in disaster response process-id12...
Civil Society Organisations for energy efficiency and sustainable transport
Serbian Civil Society Baseline Study 2011
Right To Information And Civil Society Organisations
Governance Role of Civil Society in SSR
University Industry Partnership For Innovations
21st Century Civil Society: Implications for Open Government
Civil Society Organisations: achieving and maintaining scale
Ad

Similar to Yanuar Nugroho - The Internet in CSOs (20)

DOCX
Civil society (1) Zameer.docx
PPTX
Civil society & India
PDF
Conference highlights - OECD Civil Society Days 2019
PDF
Role of Civil Society - Internet governance and developing countries
PPTX
Indian Civil Society & Global Civil society
PDF
Civil society 1st Edition Michael Edwards
PPTX
Project planning
DOC
THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN PEACE BUILDING
PPT
NGOs In Libraries: Why Bother? -- Jim Church
PDF
Civil society 1st Edition Michael Edwards
PPTX
Social Mobilization and Rural Development” -NUDRT MUFTI
PDF
Civil society 1st Edition Michael Edwards
PDF
Case 4 space 1.2. presentation heike alefsen_undg.pptx
PDF
CITIZENS IN ACTION by Yanuar Nugroho
PDF
International Encyclopedia of Civil Society 2010th Edition Helmut K. Anheier
PPTX
Community Perspectives at the Local and Grassroots Levels.pptx
PDF
Civil society 1st Edition Michael Edwards
PDF
International Encyclopedia of Civil Society 2010th Edition Helmut K. Anheier
PDF
9780230_577664_05_cha04
PPT
Civil society (1) Zameer.docx
Civil society & India
Conference highlights - OECD Civil Society Days 2019
Role of Civil Society - Internet governance and developing countries
Indian Civil Society & Global Civil society
Civil society 1st Edition Michael Edwards
Project planning
THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN PEACE BUILDING
NGOs In Libraries: Why Bother? -- Jim Church
Civil society 1st Edition Michael Edwards
Social Mobilization and Rural Development” -NUDRT MUFTI
Civil society 1st Edition Michael Edwards
Case 4 space 1.2. presentation heike alefsen_undg.pptx
CITIZENS IN ACTION by Yanuar Nugroho
International Encyclopedia of Civil Society 2010th Edition Helmut K. Anheier
Community Perspectives at the Local and Grassroots Levels.pptx
Civil society 1st Edition Michael Edwards
International Encyclopedia of Civil Society 2010th Edition Helmut K. Anheier
9780230_577664_05_cha04

More from Ian Miles (20)

PPT
Scenarios - approaches for exploring urban futures
PPTX
What has happened to Foresight in the UK?
PPTX
The future of services
PPTX
changing innovation and reshaping policy
PDF
KIBS - Knowledge Intensive Business Services - role in innovation systems
PPTX
Service Innovation Policy
PPTX
The New Service Economy: Innovation in Services
PPTX
Knowledge Intensive Business Services and Innovation
PPTX
Service Innovation - an overview
PPTX
Grand Challenges, Disruptive Inovations, and Foresight
PPT
Grand challenges and uk foresight
PDF
The Digital economy's next Top e-Business Model
PDF
Service economy 3.0
PPT
2011 autumn e business models 2
PPT
2011 autumn e business 1
PPTX
It industry innovation
PPT
E business part 4 of 4
PPT
E business 3
PPT
E business 2
PPT
e-Business part 1
Scenarios - approaches for exploring urban futures
What has happened to Foresight in the UK?
The future of services
changing innovation and reshaping policy
KIBS - Knowledge Intensive Business Services - role in innovation systems
Service Innovation Policy
The New Service Economy: Innovation in Services
Knowledge Intensive Business Services and Innovation
Service Innovation - an overview
Grand Challenges, Disruptive Inovations, and Foresight
Grand challenges and uk foresight
The Digital economy's next Top e-Business Model
Service economy 3.0
2011 autumn e business models 2
2011 autumn e business 1
It industry innovation
E business part 4 of 4
E business 3
E business 2
e-Business part 1

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Reconciliation AND MEMORANDUM RECONCILATION
PDF
Outsourced Audit & Assurance in USA Why Globus Finanza is Your Trusted Choice
DOCX
unit 1 COST ACCOUNTING AND COST SHEET
PPTX
Probability Distribution, binomial distribution, poisson distribution
PDF
kom-180-proposal-for-a-directive-amending-directive-2014-45-eu-and-directive-...
PPTX
ICG2025_ICG 6th steering committee 30-8-24.pptx
PDF
Ôn tập tiếng anh trong kinh doanh nâng cao
DOCX
unit 2 cost accounting- Tender and Quotation & Reconciliation Statement
PDF
Solara Labs: Empowering Health through Innovative Nutraceutical Solutions
PDF
MSPs in 10 Words - Created by US MSP Network
PPT
Chapter four Project-Preparation material
PPTX
The Marketing Journey - Tracey Phillips - Marketing Matters 7-2025.pptx
PPTX
CkgxkgxydkydyldylydlydyldlyddolydyoyyU2.pptx
DOCX
Business Management - unit 1 and 2
PPTX
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation - Copy.pptx
PDF
SIMNET Inc – 2023’s Most Trusted IT Services & Solution Provider
PDF
COST SHEET- Tender and Quotation unit 2.pdf
PDF
20250805_A. Stotz All Weather Strategy - Performance review July 2025.pdf
PDF
Stem Cell Market Report | Trends, Growth & Forecast 2025-2034
PPTX
Amazon (Business Studies) management studies
Reconciliation AND MEMORANDUM RECONCILATION
Outsourced Audit & Assurance in USA Why Globus Finanza is Your Trusted Choice
unit 1 COST ACCOUNTING AND COST SHEET
Probability Distribution, binomial distribution, poisson distribution
kom-180-proposal-for-a-directive-amending-directive-2014-45-eu-and-directive-...
ICG2025_ICG 6th steering committee 30-8-24.pptx
Ôn tập tiếng anh trong kinh doanh nâng cao
unit 2 cost accounting- Tender and Quotation & Reconciliation Statement
Solara Labs: Empowering Health through Innovative Nutraceutical Solutions
MSPs in 10 Words - Created by US MSP Network
Chapter four Project-Preparation material
The Marketing Journey - Tracey Phillips - Marketing Matters 7-2025.pptx
CkgxkgxydkydyldylydlydyldlyddolydyoyyU2.pptx
Business Management - unit 1 and 2
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation - Copy.pptx
SIMNET Inc – 2023’s Most Trusted IT Services & Solution Provider
COST SHEET- Tender and Quotation unit 2.pdf
20250805_A. Stotz All Weather Strategy - Performance review July 2025.pdf
Stem Cell Market Report | Trends, Growth & Forecast 2025-2034
Amazon (Business Studies) management studies

Yanuar Nugroho - The Internet in CSOs

  • 1. New Information Technology and Civil Society Yanuar Nugroho, Ph.D Research Associate Suite 8.07 Harold Hankins Building [email_address] KEIS 7
  • 2. Structure 30+ minutes presentation …. … but … a LOT of stories from the field  questions/clarifications at ANY time during presentation (hopefully) some reflections (substantial/theoretical) at the end
  • 3. Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is new in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
  • 4. Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is new in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
  • 5. What is Civil society? The search for ‘polis’ ( Aristotle ) One of the cornerstones of vibrant societal sphere, providing voices for the disenfranchised and creating centres of influence outside the state and the economy ( Anheier et al., 2002; Anheier et al., 2001; Deakin, 2001; Keane, 1998 ). A sphere of ideas, values, institutions, organisations, networks, and individuals located between the family, the state, and the market ( CCS-LSE, 2006 ) Global, network CS: CS that it is operating beyond the confines of national societies, polities, and economies. Not just CS that spills over borders and offers transnational opportunity for debates, but influences framework of global governance ( Anheier et al., 2001a:11; Kaldor et al., 2004:2 ).
  • 6. Civil Society Organisations CSOs : the entity of the sphere of social life which organises itself autonomously –not established and/or directly controlled by the state ( Deakin, 2001:4-8 ). CSOs: the autonomous, democratic civil society entity, as expressed in organisations independent of the state and of corporate structure. Gramsci ( 1971 ): CS is not only the sphere where existing social order is grounded but also where new social order can be founded  a dialectic relationship: (1) the ideological agencies that are sustained by the state’s coercive apparatus that shape morals and culture; (2) CS has autonomy, more fundamental than the state, and hence is the basis upon which a state can be founded. CS is both shaping and being shaped –an agent of stabilisation, reproduction, and transformation
  • 7. Civil Society Studies Yet, despite being prominent, theory and conceptualisation of civil society (and CSO) has been in constant debate and contestation and probably not been academically mature ( Anheier et al., 2001b; Kaldor et al., 2004 ). But “debating the meaning of the term contributes to an open and self-reflexive civil society in the end” ( Kaldor, et al., 2004:2 ). Since the 1990's interests in civil society studies have increased rapidly General-theoretical ( like Anheier, 2003; Edwards, 2004; Hajnal, 2002; Hall, 1995; Kaldor, 2003; Keane, 1998; Wainwright, 2005 ) Specific-empirical ( such as, Anheier et al., 2002; Blumer, 1951; Edwards and Hulme, 1992; 1997; Hajnal, 2002 ).
  • 8. CSO, or NGO? A clarification Many use both terms interchangeably and put little attention on their difference and analyse them as a single entity. Yet, it may be an analytical mistake, since, Civil society constitutes a vast array of associations, including trade unions, professional associations, religious groups, cultural and sports groups and traditional associations, many of which are informal organizations that are not registered. Nonetheless, despite the huge variety of different types of organisations that are found in the developing world, most of the funding from international sources for service provision is channelled through non-governmental organisations. The NGO sector in most developing countries is formally organised and often subject to certain government regulations, and has developed considerable capacity and experience in the delivery of development projects. For this reason, although it is important to keep the terms CSO and NGO analytically distinct, in practice the majority of CSOs involved in service provision are NGOs ( Clayton, 2000:1-2 )
  • 9. ‘ Advocacy ’ CSOs The most important agents in state-society relations are ‘social forces’ instead of social classes ( e.g. Migdal, 1994 ). Various social forces (regardless class status) try to impose themselves on the political arena, prescribe others their goals and respond to existing problem  The relation between state and society can be understood as a continuous struggle for social control and domination involving different groups and organisations. This explains not only the social and political context of CSOs operation, but also the formation of social movement and the dynamics of civil society itself. CSOs activism in promoting civic engagement, particularly at grassroots level, is inevitably political and transforming. This area –democratisation, grassroots politics, and mobilisation– is one main area of CS activisms and CSOs are labelled as ‘political’ or ‘advocacy’ or ‘social movement CSO’.
  • 10. ‘ Development’ CSOs Another area: development, particularly orientated toward poverty reduction. The success contribution of CSOs in reducing poverty is due mainly to their ‘rootedness’ (closeness) to the poor communities and to their effort to cooperate with them ( Barlow and Beeh, 1995 ). Among many examples, CSOs not only assist the poor in rural area, but also help in empowerment through education and training, resettlement and transmigration and family health and other welfare matters. In contemporary issues and concerns, some progressive CSOs also pursue women’s affairs, environment, human rights, and transfer technology to village communities. CSOs working this area are often generally categorised as ‘development CSOs’.
  • 11. Advocacy vis-à-vis Development Adopted and modified from Fakih (1996), Eldridge (1995) and Hope and Timmel (1988)
  • 12. Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is new in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
  • 13. Role of the new ICTs in CS The emergence of information technology, particularly the Internet, has given new impetus for the birth, or more precisely the reinvention, of networked civil society ( Hajnal, 2002 ). That is, a networked of organisations, groups, and movement within civil society aiming at mainly widening participation in political decision making for ‘civic agendas’ such as development, protection of environment, defence of human rights, among many others. There is a virtuous relationship between (global) civil society, civic agenda, and network society. (Global ) Civil Society Network Society Civic Agenda
  • 14. Role of the new ICTs in CS It is through the facilitation in communication and participation via Internet technology that a network society is formed and thus strengthens global civil society ( Warkentin, 2001 ) Because the Internet’s inherent characteristics and transnational reach parallel (or correspond to) those of global civil society, the medium serves as both a logical and an effective tool for establishing and maintaining social connections that can contribute to global civil society… By increasing the ease with which people can establish and maintain relationships, share resources and information, and coordinate their activities, the Internet aids the process of building and maintaining the social bases of global civil society. ( Warkentin, 2001:33 ) Information technology provides both opportunities and constraints for actors participating in global civil society – in some ways expanding and in other ways contracting available means for interacting ( Warkentin, 2001 ).
  • 15. Role of the new ICTs in CS Democratic participation, can be facilitated through multiple connections which ensure informed and interactive politics ( Sey and Castells, 2004: 363 ). Historically, democracy meant having selected an élite of political representatives in political discussions. Then, having ‘direct’ democracy by involving the citizen in the decision making process became the ideal. With the help of information technology this ideal has become possible today although still considered problematic ( Coleman, 1999 ). The rise of the network society characterised by the appropriation of information technology has provided a renewed support for this vision (Richard, 1999) But, “it is only under the conditions of an autonomous citizenship and an open, participatory, formal political channel that the Internet may innovate the practice of politics” ( Sey and Castells, 2004:370 ).
  • 16. Some ICT use in CS/CSOs Despite problem of access (esp. in developing countries) the Internet also has the potential to be a ‘platform’ for organising strategic activities of CSOs (Surman and Reilly, 2003). building and strengthening the identity of CSOs in cyber-civic space for social reform (Lim, 2002; 2003a; 2003d) through coalition building (Diani, 2003; Rucht, 1989). by creating networks of opposition (Sey and Castells, 2004) which to some extent can be of important factor in leading to a creation of ‘insurgent space’ (Lim, 2002). establishing collaboration, publishing (campaign), mobilisation and observation (watchdog activities) (Camacho, 2001; Lim, 2004a; Surman and Reilly, 2003). Appropriation of ICT for social transformation would be optimum when it is addressed strategically towards movement development and organisational networks.
  • 17. Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is new in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
  • 18. Context of investigation Indonesia Multi-methods 268 CSOs were surveyed, 35 CSOs were interviewed, 15 case studies/observations, 3 workshops of 74 CSOs, 2 FG of 9 CSOs
  • 20. Pattern of Internet adoption Information Technology adoption Length of adoption (years) >10 (leaders) 5-10 (early majority) 3-5 (late majority) <3 (laggard) PC 21.64% 35.45% 24.25% 10.82% The Internet 5.97% 28.73% 26.87% 19.03% Estimated Variables Late majority and laggards (75.56%) Leaders and early majority (24.44%) Period of Internet use (years) <3; 3-5 5-10; >10 Age of the organisation (years) 0-1; 1-2; 2-5; 5-8; 8-10 >10 Number of staff (persons) <5; 6-10; 11-15 16-20; 21-25; >25 Annual turn over (IDR) <100 million; 100-500 million 500 million - 1billion; 1-2 billion; >2 billion
  • 21. Pattern of Internet adoption Parameter estimation: Issues and concerns of each category N=268; Latent Class Analysis. BIC(LL)=5407.792; NPar=94; L2=4214.830; df=127; p<0.0001; and Class.Err=2.6%.
  • 24. Sequence of adoption Parameter estimation: application used by each category N=268; Latent class analysis. BIC(LL)=2024.3602; NPar=90; L2=983.6697; df=131; p<0.0001 and Class.Err=4.35%
  • 26. Technological Substitution In what way has your organisation benefited from its use of the Internet? Score How the Internet is perceived as technological substitution. As … Building wider network with other organisation 1067 Apparatus for building network More effective management of organisation (back-office & internal communication) 970 Organisational management tool Cost saving in general 852 Advanced communication technology Better publication/communication of idea with public/other organisation 850 Publication media, Public relation tool Collaborative project with other organisation(s) 765 Advanced collaborative instrument Fund-raising, including networking with donor 685 New way for fundraising Campaign/Opinion building 574 Means for campaigning and opinion building Other 41
  • 28. Negative aspects? Reasons for not using the Internet What negative aspects have you been experiencing in using the Internet in your CSO?
  • 30. Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is new in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
  • 31. Instances of Internet use Empowering beneficiaries, spreading global awareness ( YDA ) Helping channel help for the most vulnerable ( JRS ) Networking advocacy ( INFID ) Research for civil society empowerment ( AKATIGA ) Shaping public views (e.g. on globalisation, as with IGJ ) Campaigning alternative (more sustainable) lifestyle ( YPBB ) Campaigning for public policy change ( ECOSOC ) Mobilisation of direct action ( case of Pornography bill ) See more at http://audentis.wordpress.com
  • 32. Strategic use of the Internet Collaboration : platform for wider collaboration not only within organisations but also between organisations. Among strategic collaboration work is networking and coalition building . Mobilisation : provide tools to help with mobilisation, including campaigns and urgent calls for action which can be facilitated by simple-but-powerful tools like emails and mailing lists. Empowerment and development : provide alternative opinion and information; help spread awareness and invite real participation in various development programmes and agendas of improvement of livelihood. Research and publication : data and information acquisition as research input (information in), and for dissemination of publication as research output (information out). Advocacy and monitoring : effective tool in helping to shape public opinion which is crucial for successful advocacy work like rallies, protests, or lobbying; a convenient means for monitoring development/watchdog activities in a certain field.
  • 33. National network growth SNA shows evidence how the national network of Indonesian CSOs expands and grows over time –i.e. in 4 (four) social transition period in Indonesia. Label shows the CSOs that were interviewed. Note that they represent the ‘centre’, ‘periphery’ and ‘isolate’
  • 34. International network growth SNA shows evidence how the international network of Indonesian CSOs expands and grows over time – i.e. in 4 (four) social transition period in Indonesia. This evidence challenges existing proposition about the role and involvement of international CSO during the transition period to democracy in Indonesia (e.g. Uhlin, 2000)
  • 35. Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is new in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
  • 36. Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is new in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
  • 39. Internet for civic engagement
  • 40. Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is new in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
  • 41. Duality – not dualism
  • 42. Lessons learned – CSO level Issues and concerns characterise the diffusion of the Internet in CSOs. Embedded values and interests of CS sector play a greater role in CSOs in the innovation process in organisations than implied by diffusion model ( Rogers, 1995; 2003 ). CSOs seem to adopt new ICTs within a culture of collaboration and co-operation with other CSOs rather than a matter of competition  whether distinctive organisational cultures at least partially account for how perceived attributes of the Internet may affect its adoption in CSOs. CSOs do not perceive the Internet as a source of competitive advantage (among their CSO peers) even though the technology offers capability to generate a high level of visibility for the organisation (for example, by means of WWW).
  • 43. Lessons learned – CSO level Use of the Internet to encourage political participation should remain relevant. CSOs’ endeavour in shaping public perception and opinion can be facilitated by CSOs being active users on the Net. It is argued that by becoming more active in the cyber-world –through creating an online persona (McCaughey and Ayers, 2003; Warkentin, 2001)—CSOs will engage in framing activities like online public opinion building, especially in the era when online media is increasingly gaining popularity. By shaping the way issues are conceptualised and understood, CSOs can often affect public opinion building in important ways. As the adoption and use of the Internet potentially enables CSOs to play more important roles in society, the implementation of the technology has to become a more integral part of organisational strategy ( as suggested by, e.g. Galliers, 2004; 2007 ). Lastly, while some areas for strategic use of the Internet in CSOs are mapped, CSOs strategically and politically facilitate the creation and maintenance of civil society’s “foundational network of social relations” ( Warkentin, 2001 ) in order to create ‘another better world’ ( Hajnal, 2002; Kaldor, 2003; Keane, 1998 ).
  • 44. Lessons learned – SM level Since Internet use affects organisational identity (Castells, 1997), CSOs need to manifest its institutional development and broaden attempts to play its role in society by re-aligning resources, re-defining organisation’s strategy, tackling organisational issues (as also suggested by Clegg and Dunkerley, 1977; McLaughlin et al., 1999; Scott, 2003). It is also with this in mind that CSOs’ members need to share a collective identity and role, develop mutual respect and increase trust among each other in order to maintain organisational cohesion. As the use of the Internet in CSOs becomes more extensive, this can result in borders between organisations disappearing and sectors within civil society converging CSOs certainly need to anticipate this development and possibly prepare for new paradigms in their socio-political activism. Not only is the future changing, but the change itself can, and will, affect CSOs’ undertakings – in which the use of the Internet will play a mediating role.
  • 45. Lessons learned – SM level Using the Internet to mobilise resources for action and pressures, the challenge is for CSOs to actually connect people and to exchange views across national boundaries on cross-cutting contemporary and global political, social and economic issues. While the Internet has successfully facilitated ways of fostering reform and development agenda to the wider public, CSOs will need to remember that the essence of social movement is real engagement, not just information exchange (Juris, 2004). For CSOs as a social movement, the most significant impact of Internet use might be its ability to interconnect organisations and networks of organisations to advance joint actions. This means an obvious challenge for CSOs to use the Internet which serves as a platform for the development of alternative discourses and strategies both in local and in global level, because this is exactly how the use of the Internet can affect the roles of CSOs in reshaping the socio-political life of society. While Internet use can facilitate collective and collaborative work particularly when CSOs endeavour to influence public policy making, CSOs need to build their own capacity in order to be able to strategically use the technology.
  • 46. Agenda What is civil society, what is civil society organisations? What is new in the ‘New Information Technology’ in CS/CSOs? How do CSOs use the new ICT? What do they use it for? What can we learn from their use? Some reflections Discussion
  • 47. Transforming technology? As we saw, the transforming and unpredictable character of technological innovation makes any manageable form of cost-benefit analysis impossible. Does this mean that we have no way by which to judge it? No, because all such technology comes into existence and develops in a context, and that context as its broadest is the one to which reference has just been made –human nature and the human condition. It is a context, however, which bears on our assessment of technology not by providing a medium in which costs and benefits may be compared, but by providing us with the standard against which the ultimate value of technology must be measured. ( Gordon Graham, Internet philosopher, 1999:169 )