Lamp+ eval
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes213 views
This document summarizes a mid-term evaluation workshop on integrating information and communication technology (ICT) into teaching. The workshop aimed to build school leadership capacity in developing pedagogical ICT use. Key topics included exploring theories of teaching and learning, assessing ICT competencies, integrating ICT into lesson plans, using formative assessment with ICT, and harnessing ICT to support self-directed and collaborative learning. Participants provided feedback on workshop strengths, takeaways, and planned applications of learning. Upcoming activities included discussing survey findings with CPDD and sharing an after-action review at a branch meeting.
Lamp+ eval
- 1. LAMP+ MID-TERM EVALUATION 10 Mar 2014
- 2. Approach • Enable strong school leadership through building capacity of MMs in deepening their pedagogical use of ICT to guide their department to transform student learning by: • enabling teacher leadership through developing their own pedagogical knowledge • enabling school leadership through developing dept/school wide pedagogy • exploring theories of teaching and learning to support their own pedagogy and dept/school wide pedagogy
- 3. Key considerations in workshop content • Purpose of TPACK – evaluation of own dept ICT • • • • • • competencies.PD approach – play with TPACK: Dr Chai CS ICT Integration plan Assessment – AfL as strong affordance SDL/CoL as process skills Cyberwellness messages – TPK, TCK connections TPACK, SDL, CoL, AfL, how are the constructs aligned? Through lesson experience?? Generate questions for HODs to engage teachers in designing ICT-enriched questions
- 4. CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ICT INTEGRATION Content • What is the nature of the subject disciplinarity? • What are the key concepts, skills and attitudes to be learnt and how are they linked across the unit? • What are the difficulties/limitations connected with teaching the concepts? • How can technologies be harnessed to represent the key concepts and connections in the unit? (TC) Pedagogy • What is the range of technologies that are appropriate to support the selected pedagogical approach for the subject discipline? • What are the different levels of technology use? • How can the technology be harnessed for SDL and COL? • In relation to SDL continuum, generate ideas on how the technologies can be harnessed for different stages of scaffolding for learning. This will direct the different levels of technology use. • In relation to COL, generate ideas on how the technologies can be harnessed for knowledge construction and meaning making.
- 5. CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ICT INTEGRATION Formative Assessment • How can the affordances of technologies be harnessed for formative assessment e.g. tracking, archiving, making thinking visible, multi-modal representation? • How can technologies capture the evidence of students’ understanding of the key concepts as a form of feedback to students to help in setting learning goals and knowing the learning gaps and how to bridge them? • How can technologies provide teachers’ feedback on students’ learning and understanding throughout the lesson and to inform the pedagogical approach? Learning Environment • Where is the lesson conducted? How is the learning space organised? What are the required resources to support the selected pedagogical approach/es? How are students organised and their expected roles and interactions? Are there certain pre-requisite skills on technologies that need to be addressed? • How can technology be harnessed to create : • a thinking classroom (for SDL, COL)? • a connected classroom? (for COL)?
- 6. Workshop feedback • Strength of the workshop • Takeaways from the workshop • What is one way your perception of ICT integration in your subject area has changed? • How are you going to apply what you have learned from this workshop? • Some suggestions for improvement
- 7. Coming up …… POST WORKSHOP 1. With the survey findings, arrange a session with CPDD to discuss: • What went well? • What could be improved? • Opportunities for future collaboration? 2. Sharing of AAR & Findings at Branch meeting