Origins of the Celts: As you have never read them before!

C r y f r i s L l y d a w e g
Origins
of the Celts
As you have never read
them before!

Origins of the Celts
As you have never read
Photo: Szkíta.jpg | Wikimedia | Public Domain
C r y f r i s L l y d a w e g

Origins of the Celts: As you have never read
License: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Publication: 2022 | Second revised edition
By the same author:
1. Scythia : L'étonnante Histoire de l'antique Irlande
2. Brittia : L’Histoire méconnue des Bretons
3. Keltia : L’étrange Histoire des Celtes
4. Nâga : L'Histoire de la population nâga
5. Maya : L’Histoire de la population maya
6. Luzia : L’Histoire ancienne du Nouveau Continent
7. Gaia : La Préhistoire revisitée
8. Koya : Les indices de la "génohistoire"
9. Sela : Des témoignages historiques surréels
10. Troia : L’Histoire de la Nouvelle-Troie
11. India : Les origines de l’Inde
12. Namaka : Les origines des peuples antiques
13. Europa : Les origines des Européens
14. Brittia II : Du Kalimantan à la Bretagne
15. NRYN : L’origine inconnue de notre humanité
16. Scythia: The Amazing Origins of Ancient Ireland
17. Ibéria : L’énigme proto-ibère
18. Furia : Les deux guerres mondiales décodées
19. Tè Ra : Quand l’Histoire dépasse la fiction
20. Origins of the Celts (sous le pseudonyme Cryfris Llydaweg)
21. Futuria : Le futur proche décodé

Page 1 of 72
Eurasian origin
Introduction
Around 600 BC, the inhabitants of Massilia (Marseille, France), a Greek colony,
referred to the people of Provence using the terminology ‘Keltoi’. Later, the
Romans would ‘latinise’ the name: ‘Celtae’ (Celts). They also used this name for all
populations north of Provence (including the Alps).
Herodotus refers to them in his book Histories.
‘This latter river has its source in the country of the Celts near the
city Pyrene, and runs through the middle of Europe, dividing it
into two portions. The Celts (Ed. Greek Keltoi) live beyond the
Pillars of Hercules, and border on the Cynesians, who dwell at
the extreme west of Europe. Thus the Ister flows through the
whole of Europe before it finally empties itself into the Euxine at
Istria, one of the colonies of the Milesians.’
The Ister is an ancient name for the Danube. The Cynesians were a population of
the Iberian Peninsula. Herodotus does not equate them with the Celts. Pyrene is a
city unknown to archaeology. Herodotus specifies that the Danube ‘begins’ near
this city. Either he is referring to its source in the Black Forest (Germany), or to a
seaside city on the Black Sea where the river flows (on the present territory of
Bulgaria).
The Romans did not equate Belgians and Germen with Celts. When confronted
with the Belgian populations of Britain, they would not equate the other peoples of
the island with Celts either. This confusion may date from the Germanic invasions
of Britain. Faced with a multitude of local populations, the Germans probably
adopted a generic term for them.

Page 2 of 72
No inscriptions from before the Roman colonisation of Gaul and the island of
Britain mention Celts. During the ‘Gallic’ war, the Romans distinguished three
Gauls: Belgium, Celtic and Aquitaine. Who were these Keltoi of Provence? What is
the origin of the Gauls of Roman Celtic? What is the link between the Keltoi and
the Gauls?
Linguistics is of little help as the root ‘kelt’ is unknown to Indo-European languages
and the Celtic peoples had an oral, not written, tradition.

Page 3 of 72
Ruins of Gonur Depe, Turkmenistan
Photo: David Stanley | Wikipedia | CC BY-SA 2.0
|
Indo-European
Originally, Indo-European referred only to speakers of specific languages. These
languages had a certain syllabic proximity and were distinguished from Semitic,
African and Asian languages. As linguists did not agree on the geographical origin
of these languages (North Indian, Eurasian or European), the terminology ‘Indo-
European’ was the result of a compromise.
Then the Indo-European became a member of a human family that shared a
certain physical resemblance, a similar (ancient) way of life and, of course,
linguistic proximity.
There are two basic theses on the origin of Indo-Europeans. According to the first,
all populations have a common background. According to the second, Indo-
Europeans are descended from local populations whose neighbourhood spread a
way of life and the linguistic elements that go with it. Many historians favour the
first thesis, and since then they have been looking for the ‘common ground’.

Page 4 of 72
What is the likely hypothesis? Knowing that Indo-European archaeological sites
stretch from Ireland to Korea (…), the thesis of the propagation of a way of life
through the neighbourhood is difficult to defend. That said, we could consider a
‘hybrid’ path: a common fund would have influenced local populations.
This hypothesis is because a population can make significant advances in agrarian,
metallurgical, architectural, economic, linguistics, etc., and use this breakthrough
to increase its influence over other populations.
There are many competing theories on the common ground. They can be grouped
using the four cardinal points: north, east, south, and west. Linguists and
historians lean towards the East. In this respect, an ancient fortified city of 30
hectares founded 4400 years ago is very fashionable. This is the city of Gonur Depe
(Turkmenistan), whose artistic wealth of artefacts uncovered is not trivial.
Some artefacts represent winged women (fertility goddesses), ‘dragons’ (half
snake, half lion) and large birds of prey that do not seem to be ‘sympathetic’ with
dragons. Finally, the extinction of this city, a thousand years later, would be due to
lasting changes in the region’s climate.
The site of Khara-Khoto in the Gobi Desert (which was not always a desert) seems
more promising. We base this on a discovery made by Pyotr Kuzmich Kozlov, a
Russian explorer, during an expedition at the beginning of the last century (1907–
1909). He wrote a report translated into English under the title Mongolia and
Amdo and the Dead City of Khara-Khoto (1923). In summary, he states that this
splendid city (still active in medieval times) had multiple foundations. However,
the sand is such an obstacle that it discourages archaeologists.

Page 5 of 72
Aeta was one of the earliest inhabitants in the Philippines
Photo: Seanaleta | Wikipedia | CC BY-SA 4.0
Population Genetics
To identify the origin of Indo-Europeans, linguistics, archaeology and history have
unfortunately failed. We will therefore call on a more recent discipline: population
genetics.
This branch of genetics is the study of the reproduction of populations. Previously,
evolution was studied from the point of view of individuals only. Nowadays, it is
also done from the point of view of populations.
Individuals are a distribution of genotypes and it is the population that generates
these genotypes. These contain the information carried by the genome of an
organism, contained in the DNA of each cell. Our human genome contains between
28,000 and 34,000 genes spread over 46 chromosomes grouped into 23 pairs. One
of these pairs consists of the chromosomes that determine a person’s sex. A man
carries a Y chromosome and an X chromosome. And a woman carries two X
chromosomes.

Page 6 of 72
Population genetics uses the Y chromosome as a ‘marker’. Finally, a ‘satellite’
genome called mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is distinct from our DNA. And only
the mother passes it on. This genome refers to mitochondria present in so-called
eukaryotic cells. All this to say that population genetics also uses it as a ‘marker’.
Y Chromosome
In population genetics, the different Y chromosomes are grouped into
‘haplogroups’. A haplogroup is a group of similar haplotypes (group of alleles) that
share a common ancestor with a single-nucleotide polymorphism mutation.
The Y Chromosome Consortium (YCC, 1991–2012) defined the first nomenclature
in 2002. According to this nomenclature, our human genus has 20 haplogroups
(noted from A to T). A haplogroup descends directly from another or from a
mutation. Here is our (simplified) ‘genetic tree’ in diagram form. The haplogroups
are highlighted in yellow (or grey for black and white publication) and the
mutations are highlighted in white.

Page 7 of 72
What is most striking is the ‘convoluted’ transition between haplogroup F and the
following ones. Now, let’s try to translate this tree on the population level, knowing
that the numerous human migrations do not make the exercise easy. To do this,
we will look for the population (or even the region) where we find the best
representation for each of them. Here is the same genetic tree (simplified) from
the population point of view.

Page 8 of 72
Indigenous Americans and Indo-Europeans are descended from the haplogroup of
the Aeta people. And the latter currently resides in the Philippines. Native
Americans and Indo-Europeans evolved on two and unrelated continents before
the official discovery of America in 1492. From the point of view of human
palaeontology, the only place where they could have crossed paths is in the Far
East, 15 to 20,000 years ago. This was before the future Indians migrated to
America through the Bering Strait (which connects Siberia and Alaska) and before
the future Indo-Europeans migrated to Central Asia and Europe.

Page 9 of 72
Mitochondrial Eve
Mitochondrial Eve is the name given to a hypothetical woman who is believed to
be the newest common maternal ancestor of humanity. And cases of paternal
transmission of mitochondrial DNA are very rare.
Considering the rate of mutation (the molecular clock concept) in this DNA,
calculations suggest that the mitochondrial Eve lived about 150,000 years ago.
Phylogeny also suggests that she lived in East Africa. Phylogeny is the study of the
relationships between individuals, populations or species.
Mitochondrial DNA has 33 haplogroups (A to Z, plus 7 variations of L). Here is our
second (simplified) ‘gene tree’ in diagram form. The haplogroups are on a yellow
background (or grey for a black and white publication) and the mutations are on a
white background. And the L is the mitochondrial Eve.

Page 10 of 72
Unlike the Y chromosome, the translation of this tree into populations is
impossible. But since haplogroups are concentrated in certain regions, we will
nevertheless draw attention to some unusual elements.
For example, we go directly from the L3 of East Africa to the M and N pair in the
Far East and Oceania, without passing through the East and Central Asia. Our
ancestor ’L3’ seemed to have good navigational skills.

Page 11 of 72
The Far Eastern M has produced half of the world’s population. And the Oceanian
N has produced the other half. Haplogroup R, mainly present in Oceania, is the
ancestor of the majority of Caucasus populations, the Middle East and Western
Europe. To put it mildly, human migration has made two complete changes of
direction: first, ‘all the way to the east’ and second, ‘all the way to the west’.
Review
If Indo-European originated in South-east Asia, it probably left the ‘family nest’
early. He then colonised regions in Asia, concentrating on temperate zones
between the 30th and 50th (geographical) parallels. This choice could be explained
by an early aptitude for agriculture and a taste for a fairly rural lifestyle.
It remains to be explained why the ancestors of the Amerindians headed east
(America) and why their Indo-European ‘cousins’ went the other way. We know
today that the Amerindians liked the great outdoors for hunting. As the seasons
changed, they did not hesitate to move around either. However, this characteristic
can be found in the Indo-European populations of the Central Asian steppes.
One thing is certain: Indo-Europeans and Amerindians were never afraid of wide
open spaces and long journeys. ‘What is the origin of the Gauls of Roman Celtic?’
For the moment, the only certain answer can be summarised: ‘far away’.

Page 12 of 72
Tokharian vocabulary (sample). Comparison to other Indo-European languages
Wikipedia
Linguistics
There are several main branches in the Indo-European language family. Usually,
it is an eleven-branched tree. Europe has seven branches: Celtic, Italic, Germanic,
Slavic, Baltic, Hellenic and Illyrian. Asia has the other four: Anatolian, Armenian,
Indo-Iranian and Tokharian.
None of these branches can claim precedence over one or more others. In other
words, the tree has no ‘trunk’. In contrast, for example, the Semitic language family
is a true family tree. This singularity is probably linked to the fact that Indo-
Europeans had an oral tradition and that the genealogy is lost.
In Europe, three non-Indo-European languages are present: Etruscan
(contemporary with Latin), Basque and Finnish (related to Estonian and
Hungarian). The origins of Etruscan and Basque are an enigma, whereas the origin
of Finns (Finnish) is more easily explained (although the origin of the Finns also
remains an enigma).

Page 13 of 72
Population genetics has pointed to a Far Eastern origin of Indo-Europeans. The
so-called Tokharian (easternmost) branch could therefore claim authorship.
However, the opposite thesis, according to which the Indo-Europeans moved from
the west to the east, has not yet had its last word. The fortified site of Brodgar in
Scotland is a millennium older (but ten times smaller) than Gonur Depe in
Turkmenistan.
Nevertheless, despite the earlier Brodgar Ness, the population density in Western
Europe seemed so low (at the time) compared to Turkmenistan that the position
is difficult to defend. Finally, Asia is so vast that it is far from having revealed all
its archaeological treasures.

Page 14 of 72
Reconstructed Srubnaya hut
Photo: Водник | Wikipedia | CC BY-SA 3.0
Cimmerians
The Cimmerians go up the Danube, settle in territories of present-day Romania,
then in the Pannonian Plain (or even in the German-Polish plain). Finally,
populations will move even further west and settle between the Paris Basin and the
Southern Alps. In conclusion, we would go so far as to suggest that this massive
Cimmerian immigration merged with the Hallstatt culture. And that it is not
foreign to the La Tène culture that developed in Europe from the year 450 BC
onwards.
The Cimmerians appear in history during an incursion into ancient Phrygia
(Anatolia, modern Turkey). They came from the Black Sea. Apparently, they left
and returned home after the death of the Phrygian ruler, the legendary Midas. They
thus inaugurated a tradition that the Gauls would adopt and that can be
summarised as follows: veni, vidi, vici (‘I came, I saw, I conquered’) and ‘venit’ (I
returned).

Page 15 of 72
One can, for example, recall the sack of Rome by the Senon Gauls led by Brennus
in 387 or 390 BC. This behaviour is atypical. In ancient times, armies fought over
territory. The Cimmerians and the Senon Gauls fought for glory.
Where did these Black Sea Cimmerians come from? Of all the ancient populations
of Eurasia, the Cimmerian population is the oldest mentioned by Greek and Latin
authors. This leads historians to consider their settlement on the shores of the
Black Sea as early as 1200 BC Let us now quote the introduction to the Wikipedia
article on ‘Kurgan’.
‘A Kurgan is a type of tumulus constructed over a grave, often
characterised by containing a single human body along with
grave vessels, weapons and horses. Originally in use on the
Pontic-Caspian steppe kurgans spread into much of Central Asia
and Eastern, Western and Northern Europe during the 3rd
millennium BC. —… —The earliest kurgans date to the 4th
millennium BC in the Caucasus, and researchers associate these
with the Indo-Europeans.’ Source: Wikipedia
Then there is an article on the ‘Srubnaya culture’.
‘The Srubnaya culture, also known as Timber-grave culture, was
a Late Bronze Age – 18th – 12th centuries BC – culture in the
eastern part of Pontic-Caspian steppe. The name comes from
Russian сруб – srub – , “timber framework”, from the way
graves were constructed. Animal parts were buried with the
body. The Srubnaya culture is a successor of the Yamna culture,
Catacomb culture and Poltavka culture. It is co-ordinate and
probably closely related to the Andronovo culture, its eastern
neighbour. Whether the Srubnaya culture originated in the east,
west, or was a local development, is disputed among
archaeologists.’ Source: Wikipedia

Page 16 of 72
‘Animal parts were buried with the body.’ Animal parts are called meat quarters.
This culture therefore considered that the deceased would need food. Before the
Gauls practised cremation (probably due to a growing population), they buried
their dead in rectangular graves. These were sometimes surrounded by a burial
enclosure. The latter is reminiscent of the wooden logs that supported the
framework of the Srubnaya tombs. Stranger still, some Gallic tombs contained
provisions, including meat quarters.
The Cimmerians and the Gauls thus had at least one belief in common: in the
passage to the afterlife, one is not only nourished by love and fresh water.
‘The Srubnaya culture is a successor of the Yamna culture.’
On the Eupedia site (European population genetics), the page Yamna Culture (c.
3500-2500 BCE) states the following.
‘The Yamna DNA samples recovered from elite serious Kurgan
southern Russia belonged overwhelmingly to haplogroup R1b-
Z2103, the essentially eastern branch of Indo-European R1b. In
the absence of other hand R1b subclades probably simple
percentage owed to the dominance of has golden royal single
aristocratic lineage among the Yamnayan elite buried in
Kurgans.’
Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA) page on the Eupedia website shows the current
distribution of this haplogroup. The highest concentrations are in the British Isles,
the former Gaul and Spain. It also shows that all regions that were least affected
by Roman colonisation have rates of 80% or more as some total population.

Page 17 of 72
Conclusion
A continuity between the Kurgan civilisation, the Yamna culture, the Srubnaya
culture, the Cimmerians (who could be considered as southern Yamnaians) and
the Gauls can no longer be excluded.
There is one last question: ‘What is the link between the Keltoi and the Gauls?’ In
response, a foray into the Bretons and Scythians of antiquity might bring its share
of surprises.

Page 18 of 72
Breton origin
Introduction
Before getting into the subject, an overview of European history is far from being
a luxury. We start with the 5th millennium BC, between 5000 and 4000 BC.
We are two thousand years before the emergence of the Egyptian civilisation.
Europe is mainly populated by hunter-gatherers. The names correspond to
cultures known from archaeology. The symbol corresponds to regions of dispersed
farmers without any special social culture. The one north of the Alps and the one
at Vinča are extensive and cover (at least) the banks of the Rhine and the Danube.
Stone architecture is not well developed and is concentrated in Brittany and
Poitou. However, in Anatolia (present-day Turkey and northern Syria), this type of
site has existed since at least the previous millennium. Finally, the ancestors of the
future Basques were already present in the Pyrenees.

Page 19 of 72
Barnenez is home to the oldest (and largest) cairn in Europe. It is 70 m long and
20–25 m wide and contains 11 burial chambers. Locmariaquer was an inhabited
site of several hectares and its population density was high (for its time). Finally,
in Carnac, the construction of the alignments began.
Is the proximity of the three sites a coincidence? One could even suggest that
Carnac was the construction site, Locmariaquer was the place where the workforce
lived and Barnenez honoured personalities of the time. In this case, what Neolithic
culture (social organisation) could deploy such resources? And for what purpose?
Between 4000 and 3000 BC
The site of Carnac is still active. In the middle of the millennium, the construction
of Stonehenge began. Finally, the first European fortified city appears in Orkney,
an archipelago in the north of Scotland: it is the Ness of Brodgar. The site is three
hectares in size and contains, among other things, a 400 m long wall.
The geographical eccentricity of this Ness challenges specialists. How can one
explain the presence of the oldest European city on an island of 500 km2 at the

Page 20 of 72
same latitude as Oslo and where 17,000 people live today? Did advanced cultures
of the time practise maritime navigation and opt for lands away from the European
continent? Finally, are they related to the one in Locmariaquer? Did they come
from local farming communities?
The sites of Carnac, Stonehenge and Brodgar are still active. New cultures appear:
the Minoan culture in Crete, the Hurrian culture in Anatolia, the Argar culture in
Murcia (Spain) and the Corded Ceramic culture in northern Europe. Minoan (the
so-called Linear A) is the first known European language and is still not
deciphered. Historians do not know whether the Minoans were Indo-Europeans
(the Hurrians were not).
The Argar culture site covers an area of 4.5 hectares and contains, among other
things, 300 m long ramparts. It is the first known fortified site on the continent. It
is less remote than Brodgar, but its geographical location is of interest to
specialists.

Page 21 of 72
By the end of the millennium, the world population would have reached
100 million. If we apply the current ratio (5%) between the European and world
populations, Europeans are 5 million at that time.
The sites of Carnac and Brodgar become extinct. A new advanced culture appears
in Anatolia: the Hatti. Indo-Europeans make their official appearance in Europe
(Illyrians, Thracians, Macedonians, Philistines, Achaeans, etc.) and in Anatolia
(Hittites, Luwians). Finally, the cultures of the urn fields and Villanova appear. We
can also add that the Phoenicians from the Near East have been criss-crossing the
Mediterranean since (at least) the beginning of the millennium.
The Scythians were already residing on the shores of the Caspian Sea at the end of
the millennium. They are Indo-Europeans, possibly from the Andronovo culture
(Siberia).

Page 22 of 72
Thracians found Phrygia and Lydia. Luwians founded (possibly) Lycia. Hatti
(already colonised by the Hittites) died out under the blows of the ‘Sea Peoples’
(and the Philistines especially). The Hurrians founded the state of Urartu. Finally,
the Iberians appear in Spain and this is the period of the creation of Athens.

Page 23 of 72
Phrygia is the victim of a Cimmerian incursion. Urartu had to admit defeat to the
Scythians and Armenians. Lydia cannot resist the Persians and the table is set for
the future Greco-Persian Wars. The Hallstatt culture succeeded that of the Urnfield
culture.
Finally, the last chapter of this essay will introduce the Fomoraig, Fir Bolg, Tuatha
De and Gaels.

Page 24 of 72
Statue of the ancient Greek historian Herodotus in the parliament of Vienna
Photo: morhamedufmg | Wikipedia | CC 0 1.0
Herodotus
Herodotus (480-c. 420 BC) was a historian and geographer. He was the son of a
certain Lyxes, probably from ancient Caria. In 469 BC, his family went into exile
in Samos because they conflicted with the Carian tyrant Lygdamos. He spent time
in Egypt, Syria, the city of Tyre (modern Lebanon), Babylon (modern Iraq), Colchis
(modern Georgia), the city of Olbia (modern Ukraine) and Macedonia.
Back in Halicarnassus, in Caria, around 454 BC, he took part in the insurrection
that overthrew the tyranny. Then he had to go into exile again and settled in Athens
where he sympathised with Sophocles. He then followed the colonists who, at the
instigation of Pericles, left to reach the city of Thurii, in south-eastern Italy. This is
called a refoundation, as this city once existed under the name of Sybaris.
We will review Herodotus’s information on the Cimmerians.

Page 25 of 72
’There is also another different story, now to be related, in which
I am more inclined to put faith than in any other. It is that the
wandering Scythians once dwelt in Asia, and there warred with
the Massagetae, but with ill success; they therefore quitted their
homes, crossed the Araxes, and entered the land of Cimmeria.
For the land which is now inhabited by the Scyths was formerly
the country of the Cimmerians. (…)’Scythia still retains traces of
the Cimmerians; there are Cimmerian castles, and a Cimmerian
ferry, also a tract called Cimmeria, and a Cimmerian Bosphorus.
It appears likewise that the Cimmerians, when they fled into Asia
to escape the Scyths, made a settlement in the peninsula where
the Greek city of Sinope was afterwards built.’
The Greek city of Sinope was south of the Black Sea. The Cimmerians would
therefore have lived in the present-day Scythian country and retreated to (western)
Asia on the shores of the Black Sea. They were also in the Bosporus (modern
Turkey). This is a strait that connects the Black Sea to the Sea of Marmara.
‘The whole district whereof we have here discoursed has winters
of exceeding rigour. For eight months the frost is so intense that
water poured upon the ground does not form mud, but if a fire
be lighted on it mud is produced. The sea freezes, and the
Cimmerian Bosphorus is frozen over.’
It is an understatement to say that at the time, the climate in this region seemed
much harsher than today.
‘Cyaxares, the grandson of Deioces, drove the Cimmerians out of
Asia.’

Page 26 of 72
Cyaxares was a Scythian ruler. It was during his reign that the Cimmerians left Asia
for good. Herodotus describes the debate among these Cimmerians before the
Scythians fell upon them.
‘At this meeting opinion was divided, and both parties stiffly
maintained their own view; but the council of the Royal tribe was
the braver. For the others urged that the best thing to be done
was to leave the country, and avoid a contest with so vast a host;
the Royal tribe advised remaining and fighting for the soil to the
last. As neither party chose to give way, the one determined to
retire without a blow and yield their lands to the invaders; but
the other, remembering the good things which they had enjoyed
in their homes, and picturing to themselves the evils which they
had to expect if they gave them up, resolved not to flee, but rather
to die and at least be buried in their fatherland. Having thus
decided, they drew apart in two bodies, the one as numerous as
the other, and fought together. All of the Royal tribe were slain,
and the people buried them near the river Tyras, where their
grave is still to be seen. Then the rest of the Cimmerians departed,
and the Scythians, on their coming, took possession of a deserted
land.’
These events took place after 630 BC, as Herodotus states that the fleeing
Cimmerians plundered the Greek city of Sinope (founded around 630 BC). To their
credit, they had a (fleeing) population to feed. So we are more than a century before
the foundation of democracy in Greece and the Cimmerians already had ‘parties’,
including the ‘people’s party’.
What happened next is not known. According to the official thesis, they were
colonised and assimilated by the Scythians. But Herodotus’s testimony does not
support this hypothesis. The idea that part of the Cimmerians went up the Danube
is not new. To support the idea, we can point out that the Greek geographer Strabo
specified that the Cimmerians had Thracian allies.

Page 27 of 72
We could recall the following scenario. The Cimmerians go up the Danube, settle
in territories of present-day Romania, then in the Pannonian Plain (or even in the
German-Polish plain). Finally, populations will move even further west and settle
between the Paris Basin and the Southern Alps. If this is the case, we are talking
about the Gauls.
Officially, the latter came from the Hallstatt culture before a hypothetical
immigration of the Cimmerians into Central Europe. These Cimmerians appeared
spontaneously and disappeared just as spontaneously in history. However, their
society had a political maturity that the ancient Greeks did not have until much
later.
In conclusion, we would go so far as to suggest that this massive Cimmerian
immigration merged with the Hallstatt culture and that it is not alien to the
La Tène culture that developed in Europe from 450 BC onwards. Having said that,
let us finally address the subject: the Bretons.

Page 28 of 72
Ar Bard (for the Lyre) and Alan Stivell (for the Celtic Harp)
Photo: Laureen Keravec (via Kergonan22) | Wikipedia | CC BY-SA 4.0
Kymry
On the ‘literary’ side, the Bretons make their historic first appearance in the oldest
European narrative: the Irish Lebor Gabála Érenn. We will use the translation by
Henri Lizeray (French author, 1844–1905) published in 1884 under the title
Leabar gabala, Livre des invasions de l’Irlande. The action would be slightly later
than the reign of Pharaoh Nectanebo II around 350 BC.
(FR-Lizeray) ‘Criomtan du Clair-Bouclier leur raconta ses
malheurs, et un remède lui fut indiqué par le druide des
Cruitnéacs, pour le temps où il serait en guerre avec les peuples
de Fidga, dans les forêts ; c’était un peuple de Bretons qui étaient
continuellement en engagement de bataille avec Criomtan.’
(EN-Free translation) ‘Criomtan of the Light Shield told them of
his misfortunes, and a remedy was indicated to him by the druid
of the Cruitneacs, for the time when he would be at war with the

Page 29 of 72
peoples of Fidga, in the forests; they were a people of Bretons
who were continually engaged in battle with Criomtan.’
Criomtan is a chief of ancient Ireland and the Cruitneacs were a population
originating from the continent and allied to the Irish ruler Erimon. The earliest
known Bretons were therefore ‘Fidga’ and did not reside in the lands of Ireland.
These Fidga seemed to behave like an expeditionary force.
Historians believe that the Bretons appeared at about the same time in present-
day Wales as the Kymry (be pronounced kumri), Cymri or Cymraeg. The earliest
known texts of the Kymry date from the 6th century AD and were inspired or even
written by Welsh bards. The best-known text is Y Gododdin or Book of Aneirin (a
bard). The poems of the bard Taliesin are also collected in the Book of Taliesin.
Finally, we can also mention the poems of Myrddin, who inspired the Merlin’s
character.
The second wave of texts is later. The major writing is the Mabinogion (also called
the Four Branches of the Mabinogi). It contains four texts developed from two
14th century manuscripts: the White Book of Rhydderch and the Red Book of
Hergest. These texts are Pwyll, Prince of Dyved, The Mabinogi of Branwen,
Manawydan son of Llyr and Math son of Mathonwy.
Of course, Welsh literature of the time is known for the Arthurian legend, but this
cannot help us in the quest for the origins of the Bretons. In short, we have only
four books: those of Aneirin, Taliesin, Rhydderch (the ‘White’ book) and Hergest
(the ‘Red’). Unfortunately, these texts do not do much better: they are short on
information about the origin of the Bretons.

Page 30 of 72
Snowdonia (Welsh: Eryri) is a mountain range in Gwynedd and Conwy, Wales
Photo: Joanna Rycerz | Pixabay
Owen Jones
Owen Jones was born in Denbighshire, Wales. In the mid-1760s, he moved to
London. He studied Welsh literature from childhood and collected old
manuscripts. Assisted by the bard Edward Williams of Glamorgan (Iolo
Morganwg) and the antiquarian William Owen Pughe, he published the Myvyrian
Archaiology of Wales in 3 volumes (1801–1807), a compilation of manuscripts
dating from the 5th to the 14th century.
These manuscripts were deposited in the British Library in London. He cofounded
the Gwyneddigion Society in London in 1770 to encourage the study of Welsh
literature. He died in 1814 at his home in Upper Thames Street, London. The
antiquarian William Owen Pughe (famous in his day) was later found to be a
forger, but his contribution to the compilation of Owen Jones’s manuscripts came
from his personal collection, which was genuine.
We will focus on a character described in these manuscripts: Hu Gadarn. He is the
first chief of the Cymri who set foot in ‘Prydein’ (modern Britain). These Cymri

Page 31 of 72
came from the ‘Land of Summer’ and more precisely from ‘Deffrobani’. They
crossed the Tawch Sea. Once on the island, they would have reached ‘Llydaw’. Two
other chiefs accompanied them: Prydein ab Aedd Mawr and Dyvnwal Moelmud.
We will come back to the Summerland and Deffrobani, but the Tawch Sea could
(conditionally) be the eastern part of the North Sea that connects present-day
Germany and Britain. As for the island of Britain, these Cymri had named it
Prydein (any tribute to Prydein ab Aedd Mawr?). The Llydaw still exists and is a
natural lake in Wales. Finally, the manuscript distinguished three tribes (one for
each chief?).
These tribes were peaceful and did not want to take over land through war. This is
probably the reason why they settled in an area away from other populations of the
time. The manuscripts show that they did not practise agriculture. It was Hu
Gadarn himself who had taught them in this field and he had started to do so in
the ‘Summerland’. However, a certain Coll, son of Colvrewi, had brought soft wheat
and barley and a certain Elldud Varchawc developed ploughing. The first ‘horned’
oxen were those of Hu Gadarn.
These Cymri had no system of laws and customs (Dyvnwal Moelmud developed
this). Worse, they had no ‘tradition’. They even decided to initiate a tradition
through songs and music. The manuscripts mention the first three ‘composers’:
Hu Gadarn himself, Tydain and Gwyddon Ganhebon.
It is probably between 450 and 350 BC. Agriculture and law systems were
widespread at this time. Why is this population non-agricultural and devoid of laws
and customs? Secondly, pacifism was rare at this time. Why is it so essential to this
population?
Horned oxen may be a reference to buffaloes. The latter were (originally)
domesticated in India (or even in South-east Asia). However, at that time they
already existed in Africa and Eurasia.
The term ‘soft wheat’ is used in contrast to ‘hard wheat’ from the Mediterranean.
The Greek philosopher Theophrastus stated in his History of Plants that the wheat

Page 32 of 72
of the Black Sea regions had the reputation of being softer, better able to withstand
transport and to keep longer. Barley, on the other hand, had been grown in Africa,
Europe and Asia for thousands of years.
The question arises: how can a population without agriculture be so good at
maritime navigation (or even at building ships)? In short, ‘Something doesn’t add
up’.
The ‘soft wheat’ puts us on the track of the Black Sea. But Herodotus, at the time,
said that the weather there was winter (eight months a year). So, the Black Sea is
no longer a candidate for the Summerland. Moreover, the Black Sea peoples not
only had agriculture and systems of laws, but some of them already practised
democracy before its official appearance in Athens.
One clue remains: ‘Deffrobani’. For some, this term referred to the peninsula of
present-day Istanbul, but no manuscript supports such a hypothesis. For others, it
is a derivative of the Greek ‘Taprobana’ which referred to an island in the Indian
Ocean at the time when Alexander reached India. Depending on the author, it is
either Ceylon or Sumatra (or even Borneo). That’s a long way to go. Finally, the
Cymri are Indo-Europeans and these remote islands have never claimed any Indo-
European populations.
Is it a dead end?
There is still the linguistic track. The Cornish and the Breton are two ‘sister’
languages. Both languages share with Gaelic about half of the syllables (excluding
sound and syntax).
There are also some similarities between Cymric and the language of the Luwians
who occupied the southern and western part of Turkey 3,500 years ago. Some
authors even suggest that the city of Troy was not Hittite but Luwian. They were
Indo-Europeans who would have been assimilated by other populations several
centuries before the Cymri migration. That said, they practised agriculture and had
a system of laws. In summary, a Luwian origin of the Cymri cannot be supported.
Nevertheless, it remains a lead for the Summerland.

Page 33 of 72
From our point of view, two hypotheses remain.
The first one ignores the geographical index (‘Deffrobani’) and the climatic clue
(Summerland). In this case, the Cymri would have originated from the Black Sea
or the Sea of Marmara (further south). This would explain their aptitude for
maritime navigation. It remains to be explained why they were not suited to
agriculture.
It is known that the Scythians overwhelmed the Cimmerians in the Black Sea in
the 7th century BC. However, it cannot be excluded that Cimmerians also lived on
the shores of the Marmara Sea. As a result, this population would have been caught
between the Scythians, Greeks and Persians. It is even possible that the Greeks or
Persians enslaved this population, as slavery was an institution in both societies.
This could explain the inability to farm because when you work in villas for
generations, you forget everything.
The Greeks took advantage of the departure of the Cimmerians from the Black Sea
to deploy colonies in former Cimmerian territories although this brought them into
direct contact with the Scythians. To deploy such ‘mushroom’ colonies, it takes
manpower and personnel. And the Greeks at the time were not used to paying for
it. Finally, we would go so far as to suggest that the Scythians had possibly taken
over some Greek colonies and since they did not practise slavery, an entire
Cimmerian population was starting over.
Moreover, one can bet that some Greeks’ ‘staff’ were sailors. The easiest (and
safest) way to transit between Greece and its Black Sea colonies was via the Aegean
and the Sea of Marmara.
A second hypothesis remains: the Cymri were originally from an island, in the
Indian Ocean. On this island, agriculture was not necessary to feed everyone. The
people were peaceful and did not see the need for a system of laws. Finally, the
weather was exceptional and it was the Land of Eternal Summer.

Page 34 of 72
In Welsh tradition, the Summerland is also a synonym for the afterlife (the Land
of the Dead). That said, it cannot be ruled out that the Cymri had an earlier and
sunnier geographical origin. The term ‘Deffrobani’ is a real mystery, but we can at
least rule out a Cymri etymology. Speaking of etymology, the Greeks referred to
the Cimmerians as ‘Kimmeroi’. The syntactic gap between Kimmeroi and Cymri is
not so great…
We will end with an anecdote. According to a Welsh tradition whose
manuscript(s), we have not been able to find, Hu Gadarn was the chosen one of the
‘god’ Diana. The latter is unknown to historians. Knowing that at that time, a hero
could become a ‘god’ at the speed of light, let us look for a hero named Diana. This
is another dead end. In that case, let’s look for a heroine. We found one: a Scythian
princess. All this to say that a romance between the ‘goddess’ and the chosen one
(of her heart) is not excluded.
Concerning the Scythians and the Cimmerians generally, historians have long
thought that they were Slavs (a family of Indo-Europeans). However, population
genetics has shown that the Indo-European populations of Britain and Western
Europe were not Slavs. Consequently, the Scythians and Cimmerians were not
either.

Page 35 of 72
Picture of Hengistbury Head. Taken June ’06
Photo: Hut 8.5 | Wikipedia | CC BY-SA 3.0
Britain
Albion for the Greeks, Prydein for the Cymri, Brittia for the Romans, the island of
Britain has not lacked diminutives. Between the first Bretons in history, who
appear in the Irish Lebor Gabála Érenn, and the British peoples discovered by the
Romans (a few centuries later), there is an archaeological void.
We summarise the little that historians know. Commercial relations existed
between Mediterranean civilisations (Carthage especially) and the populations of
the south of the island. They mainly concerned the trade in metals (gold, tin),
hunting dogs and slaves. The site of Hengistbury Head (county of Dorset) was a
hub as early as the 3rd century BC. Finally, the alleged Gauls known as ‘Veneti’
seemed to play a role as intermediaries. In short, nothing is known about the
populations of the island before the arrival of the Romans.
Here are the main populations of the island in the first century AD. The source is
the Greek geographer Ptolemy.

Page 36 of 72
To decipher this patchwork, the Irish Lebor Gabála Érenn will prove very useful.
It may be added that the populations of the time used to name themselves after a
common ancestor or place of origin. We will look at the populations in a north-
south and east-west direction.

Page 37 of 72

Page 38 of 72
We summarise: Gaelic (12), Cymraeg (7), Bolg (5), Brittonic (4), Domnann (2) and
not set (4). The last chapter (Scythian origin) gives details of the Bolg and
Domnann. Historians sometimes equate the Brittons with the Bretons. The
Brittons were piratical between the mainland and the island of Britain. The
Romans probably had contact with them before they set foot on the island. It would
therefore not be surprising if the Latin name of the island, Brittia, derived from
Brittons. The origin of these continental ‘pirates’ remains untraceable. That said,
the last chapter (Scythian origin) gives a clue.

Page 39 of 72
A Young Breton Woman (1903)
Artist: Roderic O’Conor (1860–1940) | Wikipedia
Brittany
We will skip over the centuries of Roman occupation in Britain. Like all colonial
periods, this is of little interest (sic). After the Romans withdrew, the islanders
faced a new challenge: the incursions of the Germans. The war lasted for two
centuries.
The Cymri will split into two groups. The first will consolidate its historic territory
(present-day Wales) and continue the Cymric tradition. The second would cross
the Channel and start afresh. In short, the Cymraeg were those who stayed and the
Brezhoneg (Bretons) were those who left. That was over fifteen centuries ago.
Despite this, today a Breton speaker can easily communicate with a Welsh speaker.
During the two centuries of conflict, Christianity made a remarkable breakthrough
on the island. The prestige of the monks had even surpassed that of the Merlin-like
‘enchanters’. Note that the inability of the druids to find a solution against the
Romans had tainted their reputation. It was therefore monks who guided the
Brezhoneg in their new environment: Gallo-Roman Armorica. Several waves of

Page 40 of 72
immigration followed, the first of which took place when the Romans left Armorica
in 410 AD.
The first settlers founded Domnonea, in the north-east of the future Britannia
Minor (Brittany). ‘Domnonea’ is a clear reference to the Domnans. In 491, they
faced a Frankish army in Blois and the final result (a ‘draw’) put an end to the
ambitions of both protagonists.
The Brezhoneg formed a second wave of immigration in 496. They avoided the
territory of the Domnans and settled in southern Armorica. They founded two
states: that of Cornouaille (southern Finistère) and that of Broërec (Bro Gwened,
Morbihan).
Four years later, on the island of Britain, the islanders won the famous battle of
Mount Badon against the Germans. This battle seems to be the event that inspired
the island’s bards and led to the legend of King Arthur and the Arthurian cycle.
At least a third wave settled in the lands of the present Poher (north-west of the
future Brittany). In 540, the name of the Poher ruler was Conomor. The Breton
etymology of this name is not convincing. This name refers to Irish names: Conn,
Connact, Conairé. In 554, the Poher and the Domnonea conflicted. Finally, the
Domnan ruler, Judual, calmed the ardour of Conomor.
A few decades later, the ruler of Broërec, Waroc II, conquered the present-day
regions of Nantes (587) and Rennes (594). From this period onwards, Armorica
was renamed ‘Britannia’.
In 635, the Frankish ruler, Dagobert, established a ‘march of Britannia’ which
delimited the border between Bretons and Franks. He included Nantes and Rennes
in the Frankish borders. At that time, Brittany would have been home to only the
three original states: Domnonea, Cornouaille and Broërec.
In 753, the Frankish ruler Pepin the Short invaded Britannia. His son,
Charlemagne, invaded Britannia three times (786, 799 and 811). The Bretons did

Page 41 of 72
not submit. The third invasion was unbelievably cruel. The Bretons sheltered their
families in monasteries and practised guerrilla warfare. Tired of chasing the elusive
Bretons, Charlemagne and his two sons looted the monasteries and exterminated
monks, women and children.
In 818, Louis the Debonair invaded and occupied Britannia. From 822 to 825, the
Bretons rose. In 831, to ease tensions, the Frankish sovereign delegated power to
an ‘emperor’s envoy’, the Breton Nominoë (originally from Poher?). Nominoë took
up residence in Vannes. In 843, a Frankish incursion was organised in the Vannes
region, which seemed to target Nominoë’s residence.
In 844, Vikings travelled up the Loire and made an incursion into Nantes. In the
same year, Nominoë broke with the Frankish power, brought Nantes back into the
Breton fold and secured the city. The following year, it was the battle of Ballon and
the Breton victory over the Franks. Three years later, in 848, the Pope of the time,
Leo IV, recognised Nominoë’s sovereignty over Brittany (which excluded Rennes).
In 850, Nominoë conquered the city of Rennes and the following year repelled two
Frankish attempts to retake it.
Thirty-fifth heads of State succeeded Nominoë and we present them briefly.

Page 42 of 72
Nominoë
Erispoë
Nominoë’s son
Salaün (Salomon)
Nominoë’s nephew
Alan Iañ
Salaün’s grandson
He led a successful
military campaign
against the Franks.
He abolished
serfdom to
repopulate the
country
Karedig
CC BY-SA 3.0
Moreau. henri
CC BY-SA 3.0
Public domain
Wrmaelon
Reigning Prince
Alan II Varvek
Alan I’s grandson
Drogo
Alan II’s son
Hoël I
Alan II’s son
Public domain
Guerech
Alan II’s son
Alan
Guerech’s son
Konan I
Count of Rennes
Jafrez I
Konan I’s son
He went to the
Court of the King of
West Francia,
Lothair to pay
homage (he
establishes a
precedent)
Pact with Richard I
of Normandy; [this
pact] established
firm Breton-
Norman links for
the first time
Wikipedia Wikipedia Public domain

Page 43 of 72
Alan III
Jafrez I’s son
Konan II
Alan III’s son
Hoël II. Alan III’s
son-in-law
Alan IV Fergant
Hoël II’s son
Coat-of-arms Coat-of-arms Banner, 1st crusade
Chapron-Radenac Public domain Joseph Eddie Seay
GwenofGwened
CC BY-SA 4.0
Konan III
Alan IV’s son
Berthe. Konan III’s
daughter
Conan IV
Earl of Richmond
Konstanza
Conan IV’s
daughter
He abolishes
several seigniorial
laws
disadvantageous to
the population
She was the last
member of the
Cornouaille House
to reign over
Brittany
Banner
Henry II of
England invaded
Brittany and forced
Conan IV into
abdicating in
Constance’s favour
Wikipedia
GwenofGwened
CC BY-SA 3.0
Wikipedia
Jafrez II
Konstanza’s spouse
Arthur I
Jafrez II’s son
Guy of Thouars
Konstanza’s spouse
Alis of Thouars
Guy’s daughter
His father,
Geoffrey, was the
son of Henry II,
England King. In
1190, Arthur was
designated heir to
the throne of
England
Public domain Wikipedia
PtrQs
CC BY-SA 4.0

Page 44 of 72
Yann I the Red
Alis son
Yann II
Yann I’s son
Arthur II
Yann II’s son
Yann III the Good
Arthur II’s son
In 1271, he
accompanied his
brother-in-law, the
future Edward I, to
the Ninth Crusade,
meeting there with
Louis IX of France Coat-of-arms
PtrQs
CC BY-SA 4.0
Wikipedia Public domain Public domain
Yann IV
Count of Montfort
Yann V ar Fur
Yann IV’s son
Frañsez I
Yann V’s son
Pêr II
Yann V’s son
Son of John of
Montfort and
Joanna of Flanders.
His father claimed
the title Duke of
Brittany (War of
the Breton
Succession) Coat-of-arms
Wikipedia Public domain Public domain Public domain
Arthur III
Yann IV’s son
Frañsez II
Yann IV’s grandson
Anna Breizh
Frañsez II’s
daughter
Claude of France
Anna’s daughter
Arthur de
Richemont. He
fought alongside
Joan of Arc, and
was appointed
Constable of France
Wikipedia Public domain
Jean Bourdichon
(1457–1521)
Public domain
Frañsez II (François II) struggles for keeping the independence of Brittany and will
never recover from wounds received during battles. Not fewer than twelve
nationalities took part in battles (included Frenchmen in the Breton ranks). His

Page 45 of 72
12-year-old daughter, Anna inherits the throne and she marries two (successive)
French sovereigns to avoid any new conflict.
Conclusion
Our foray into the Bretons leads to the conclusion that their involvement in Celtic
culture is almost non-existent in antiquity. On the other hand, the Scythians,
whom we describe in the next chapter, could lay claim to this culture and to the
Druidic religion that frames it.

Page 46 of 72
Scythian origin
Introduction
In 1314, the Battle of Bannockburn gave Scotland its independence. On 6 April
1320, the Scottish ruler, Robert Bruce, and fifty signatories sent a declaration of
independence to Pope John XXII. This is the Declaration of Arbroath, written in
Latin. And it contains a surprising passage:
‘(…) and ex antiquorum gestis and libris Colligimus quod inter
Ceteras naciones egregias nostra scilicet Scottorum NATO multis
preconijs fuerit insignita, that from Maiori Schithia per Pool
tirenum and Columpnas Herculis (…)’.
In plain English, the signatories speak of ancient achievements and writings that
demonstrate that the nation of Scots originated in Scythia Major and came via the
Tyrrhenian Sea (part of the Mediterranean) and the Columns of Hercules
(Gibraltar).
But why would a northern European nation claim the legacy of an ancient
population from the Central Asian steppes?

Page 47 of 72
Buner reliefs Scythian bacchanalian cropped
Photo: Dan Diffendale | Wikipedia | CC BY-SA 2.0
Scythians
The origin of the Scythians is unknown. They appear in history around 700 BC
through documents from ancient Assyria. But it is at least known that they are
Indo-Europeans and that they are probably descended from Kurgan or Turanians.
And we also know that they had settlements in Egypt and Korea, even if their
preferred land was the plains north of the Caucasus and the shores of the Caspian
Sea. What is certain is that distances did not frighten them. We even know that one
of their branches, the Sogdians, traded with China.
The Scottish elite relied on the oldest story in Europe: the Lebor Gabála Érenn.
‘Lebor Gabála Érenn (literally “The Book of the Taking of
Ireland”), known in English as The Book of Invasions, is a
collection of poems and prose narratives in the Irish language
intended to be a history of Ireland and the Irish from the creation

Page 48 of 72
of the world to the Middle Ages. There are a number of versions’
Source: Wikipedia.
We have chosen two translators.
‘Macalister was born in Dublin, Ireland, the son of Alexander
Macalister, then professor of Zoology, University of Dublin. His
father was appointed professor of anatomy at Cambridge in
1883, and he was educated at The Perse School, and then studied
at Cambridge University. Although his earliest interest was in
the archaeology of Ireland’ Source: Wikipedia.

Page 49 of 72
Henry Lizeray continues to be an unknown but he founded the Druidic and
National Church in Paris (1885). His direct translation (1884) was the first in the
French language.
The difficulty in reading this book is to distinguish the Irish tradition (the original
text) and the biblical tradition (the text added by medieval copyists). Because of
this addition, it is surprising that historians consider the Lebor Gabála Érenn to
be a legend when it describes with great accuracy characters and events from the
distant past. Some of these characters have been used in Irish mythology, but the
‘Book’ (we will use this diminutive term) shows that all the deities involved were,
without exception, mere mortals. And when the biblical tradition is subtracted
from the text, we are dealing with a book of history.
In the format of the 1884 French translation, the Book is 180 pages long and we
will concentrate on pages 8 to 95. These pages describe the 6 major invasions of
Ireland. Medieval copyists changed the original dates to coincide with
the biblical calendar. It is therefore lost. But by cross-referencing events of the
Book with historical events, we can deduce that the second invasion took place
around 1200 BC. And the most surprising thing is that the populations involved in
invasions 2 to 6 have the same common ancestors, namely two Indo-Europeans
from the shores of the Caspian Sea: Aitech and his brother Baath. They are
therefore the patriarchs of Ireland.
We have tried to restore the original calendar and so far this is what we can offer
(at that time, rulers could live long and beget late):
Columns
 The Book: event Event reported in the Book
 BC From Current dating of Egyptology
 BC To Idem
 The Book: year Canonical year in the Book
 The Book: generation Generation deduced from the Book
 * Average nb of years per generation
 BC? Our proposal

Page 50 of 72
As the Book will show, the descendants of these patriarchs will influence events in
Greece and Spain. And on their way, they will meet Egyptians, Athenians,
Philistines, Cruitneacs in the north of Europe, Bracas (?) in Spain, Fomoraig on
the island of Britain (now Great Britain), etc. We will ignore the first invasion,
whose population was decimated in less than a year due to a disease (or even an
epidemic). But before tackling the second invasion, we will describe the
background of the ancestors of these ‘invaders’.

Page 51 of 72
Caucasus Mountains
Photo: Richard Mcall | Pixabay
Nel and Scota
It all starts in the Caucasus where Aitech and Baath are said to have lived. The
latter has a grandson, Nel, a Fenni prince (an Indo-European population of the
region whose leader is his father, Feinius Farsaid). Nel married one of the
daughters of the pharaoh at the time. This girl was called Scota and her name is
said to be the etymology of the word Scythian and of the word Scot. But Nel and
Scota only travelled between the Caspian and Red Seas and never set foot in
Western Europe. It is worth noting that 3,000 years ago, the Mediterranean Sea
and the Red Sea were connected by an arm of the sea that was hazardous to
navigation. And this seemed to be linked to the shallow water and the presence of
quicksand.
As for Scota, she is said to have met the famous Moses in her homeland. The
encounters between Scota and Moses are so realistic that this addition by medieval
copyists can be considered a masterpiece. Nel and Scota had a first son, Gaedel
Glas, who was nicknamed the Green. His name is said to be the etymology of the
term Gael, the people who carried out the last invasion of Ireland. But Gaedel the
Green will never see Western Europe, let alone the green of Ireland.

Page 52 of 72
Let’s leave Baath’s descendants aside for the moment and return to his brother
Aitech. If we consider Aitech’s generation as the first generation, it is one of his
descendants in the 6th generation who will lead the second invasion of Ireland.

Page 53 of 72
Sicily (sea shore)
Photo: Marpiclic | Pixabay
Partholon
Partholon is thus of the 6th generation. He lives in Sicily, in a colony of a Scythian
population based in Greece. Everything is going well until he and his brother
decide to murder their parents to take over. Then he heads to Greece (apparently
to be accountable) and stays there for a year. At the end of his stay, he, his wife and
his retinue head for Ireland via Aladacia (linked to ancient Dacia), the columns of
Hercules (Gibraltar) and Spain.
The journey took two months and twelve days. The year was around 1200 BC.
Historians know that at that time, the Phoenicians travelled the Mediterranean
and even the Atlantic coast of Europe, and that they had trading posts on the
Mediterranean coast of Spain. But the most surprising thing is the maritime
mastery of these populations originating from the Central Asian steppes.
The question remains: how did Partholon know about Ireland? In this respect, one
may wonder whether Phoenician merchants were not already transporting tin
from the ancient Isles of Scilly (British Isles) to the Mediterranean. It is worth

Page 54 of 72
remembering that tin was used in the most important alloy of the time: bronze, an
alloy of copper and tin. And tin was less scarce on the shores of the Atlantic than
in the Mediterranean basin.
When Partholon set foot in Ireland, the island was deserted and it was necessary
to clear the land to develop agriculture. He and his retinue, including three druids
(around 1200 BC), roll up their sleeves and after ten years, the result is very
successful. And this attracts the attention of a nation based on the neighbouring
island of Britain. The members of this nation are called the Fomoraig (Fomoirii).
They were not Bretons because the latter landed in Britain eight centuries after.
Apparently, the Fomoraig are not very advanced. They are unable to develop
agriculture to the extent that their food is limited to ‘fish and birds’. On the other
hand, they have skills in building cities and ships and in making weapons. The
confrontation between the Partholon retinue (whose number is not specified) and
eight hundred Fomoraig is very violent. And no native is spared. It should be
remembered that the Scythians were known in antiquity for their fighting skills.
Two hundred years later, the Scythian colony in Ireland will reach nine thousand
members. But in a single week, the population would be eradicated by the ‘plague’.
This ‘diagnosis’, probably made by medieval copyists, is dubious, for the plague
does not eradicate a population in a week. And one cannot rule out the hypothesis
of a Fomoraig late revenge by a large-scale poisoning (of drinking water?). And
there is no mention of the fact that a colony of nine thousand Scythians is starting
to look scary.

Page 55 of 72
Caspian Sea, near Baku
Photo: Roya Mehralizade | Pixabay
Nemed
Only 30 years later, a certain Nemed, his spouse Relbeo, daughter of the ‘king’ of
Greece (according to Ó Cléirigh’s), and his people set foot on the island of Ireland.
Compared to his ancestor Aitech, he is of the 9th generation. But where did Nemed
come from? And why Ireland?
Nemed came from Scythia, in which he exercised an authority that is not specified
in the Book. His point of departure was the Caspian Sea. At that time it was possible
to sail between the Caspian Sea and the Cimmerian (Black) Sea. Nemed’s fleet
consisted of thirty ships (between one thousand eight hundred and three thousand
people). It is said to have strayed into the ‘Cod Sea’ (the North Atlantic?) to such
an extent that it took one and a half years to reach Ireland.
For the rest, the reasons for this departure from Scythia are not specified. As
Partholon was Nemed’s great-great-uncle, one or more of his ships may have sailed
regularly between Ireland and Scythia. In this case, Scythia had not heard from
Partholon for 30 years.

Page 56 of 72
Nemed landed in Ireland. The Fomoraig did not occupy the island (probably
because of their unsuitability for agriculture). But they occupied a fortified place
on a promontory and were led by a certain Conaing, son of a Fomoraig ruler from
Britain. So, before clearing plains, Nemed began to build ‘raths’, circular fortified
ditches in the middle of which the Scythians built their habitats.
The confrontation with the Fomoraig is inevitable. Two Fomoraig kings come to
Conaing’s aid. Despite numerous setbacks, Nemed is almost winning when a
‘plague’ (strangely reminiscent of the one that exterminated the Partholon
population) takes the lives of him and three thousand of his subjects. And the
surviving Scythians submit.
Tired of a long servitude (about 160 years), the descendants of the Scythians,
whom we will call the Nemedians (for ease of reading), send an embassy to the
descendants of Nemed’s Greek in-laws. And the Greeks are happy to come to the
rescue. We can state that we are around 700 BC, several centuries after the Trojan
War. And at that time, the Greek warriors may have needed action. So they charter
a fleet of three hundred ships and there are thirty thousand of them (…) when they
land in Ireland.
Afterwards, there is little suspense, although the Fomoraig put up a good fight. The
Greeks sack the Fomoraig’ fortified place and the Nemedians return the honours
and release them from their obligations. The Greeks set sail again with most (if not
all) of the booty. And the Nemedians deal with their dead, who still litter the floor
of the ancient fortress of Fomoraig.
But a fleet is pointing out to sea and it is not the Greek fleet but that of the
Fomoraig’s ruler, More (that is his name). The Nemedians, who have lost many
men, find themselves greatly outnumbered and defend the port at all costs to
prevent Fomoraig from deploying. But the events do not end there. A violent storm
arises and sweeps away the entire Fomoraig fleet (except for More’s ship). And it
also sweeps away all the men who were fighting on the shore, except for thirty
Nemedians. The Book explains that the ruler More was so thirsty for revenge that
he did not put his fleet under cover and this forced all the protagonists on the shore
to continue the fight.

Page 57 of 72
For the thirty survivors, this is too much. They have paid too heavy a price on this
land of Ireland, and they decide to leave it. As the three remaining leaders could
not agree on the destination, they split into three groups. The first group will sail
to Greece, the second will land on islands in northern Greece and the third will sail
to the island of Britain, the land of the Fomoraig. The third group’s destination
seems reckless (even unconscious) but the destruction of the Fomoraig ruler’s fleet
could reinforce this bold choice. We can also specify that this group is led by Britan
(Britain, Ó Cléirigh’s Breotan) and Fergus Red-Side, his father, two accomplished
warriors.

Page 58 of 72
Young Irish sisters
Author: Pretty Sleepy Art | Pixabay
Fir Bolg
Two hundred years after the departure of the Nemedians, new Scythians set foot
on Irish soil. They were the 18th generation of their ancestor, Aitech. They call
themselves the Fir Bolg. In their language, Fir means Men and a bolg means a
leather bag for carrying soil. According to some historians, the term bolg is the
etymology of the Belgian. In this respect, we can recall that the Roman army that
occupied the island of Britain much later compiled a list of the island’s populations.
This list included several Belgian populations (grouped in the south and south-east
of the island).
The Fir Bolg are ruled by five brothers, the eldest of whom, Slaine, was Ireland
‘first king’. They are descendants of the Nemedians group who left Ireland for
Greece. At first they were warmly welcomed by the Greeks, since the exploits of the
Greek warriors on the island of Ireland were still fresh in their minds. However,
the soaring population of the Nemedians eventually worried the Greek authorities
and they decided to enslave the Scythians.

Page 59 of 72
Tired of their servitude, the descendants of these Nemedians escaped from the
‘stony’ mountains where they were confined to forced labour. They used a
stratagem by hiding in leather bags used to evacuate the soil (stones?). Then they
eventually reached a place of embarkation. The Book does not give details of the
chartering of ships and the sea journey.
Once on the island of Ireland, they divided it into five territories. The Book says
little about the Fir Bolg, but it does state that their sovereignty over Ireland was
never contested until the arrival of the Tuatha De.
In conclusion, the Fir Bolg were divided into three tribes: the Fir Bolg themselves,
the Gailioin and the Fir Domnann. Concerning the Fir Domnann, we can recall that
in Roman times, there were Damnonii and Dumnonii tribes on the neighbouring
island of Britain.

Page 60 of 72
Imbros gorge
Photo: FotoIT | Pixabay
Tuatha De
Eighty years after the arrival of the Fir Bolg, the new conquerors call themselves
the Tuatha De. In their language, Tuatha means ‘people’ and De ‘goddesses’. From
the ancestor Aitech, they are 22nd generation descendants and are also
descendants of the group of Nemedians who left the island of Ireland for the
islands of northern Greece.
The Book tells us that these islands were four in number. We may recall that in the
northern Aegean Sea there are four islands: Samothrace, Thasos, Imbros and
Lemnos. About Samothrace, ancient Greek historians are aware of the religious
importance of this island for the Greeks. The Book states that druidism and
‘sciences’ were taught on these islands.
(Ó Cléirigh only) When their ‘studies’ were complete, the Nemedians left the
islands with a memento from each island. And these souvenirs became objects of
veneration among the ancient Irish. We start with the spear of Lug (Lugad), a god
of Irish mythology (a Tuatha De born much later). Then we continue the sword of

Page 61 of 72
Nuadu, another god (another Tuatha De born much later). We continue with the
cauldron of Dagda. Dagda was a nickname (or title) borne by Eochaid, a Tuatha
De. The latter’s nickname was the Great Patriarch (born much later). Contrary to
what some historians claim, Dagda was never the name of a character in the Book
and even less that of a god. And we end with the famous Stone of Destiny. It has
been present at every coronation of the British monarchy for centuries. The Book
states that this stone made, in ancient times, a ‘noise’. Finally, Destiny refers to the
Island of Destiny, an Ireland ancient nickname.
(Ó Cléirigh only) After these Nemedians left these northern Greek islands with
their memories, they settled for about 200 years in a territory between the
Athéansta (Athenians) and the Félistinéada (Philistines). These two neighbours
regularly quarrelled, and the descendants of the Nemedians remained cautious on
the sidelines. Until one day, after a terrible battle, the descendants of the
Nemedians (the future Tuatha De) healed many of the Athéansta to the point of
restoring many of them to health.
The expression ‘to health’ is a mild euphemism, as this anecdote in the story is
surreal. It is best to quote the French translation.
(Ó Cléirigh only, free translation from Lizeray’s text) ‘They fought
with all their strength and the victory was won over the
Athéansta, so that all their troops were slaughtered, except for a
few. Then the Tuatha De began to heal the Athéansta and by their
sorcery (by their druidism) they put demons into the bodies of the
slain heroes among the Athéansta, who were still ready for battle
and made new provocations. Great was the surprise of the
Félistinéada when they saw the men they had killed fighting
them again the next day. They informed their Druids of this; the
Dean of the Druids gave them his advice and said to them: bring
(he said), wooden spears and tree bark to the battle tomorrow,
and if you win, place the wooden spears on the necks of the men
you will kill tomorrow: if they are demons, a crowd of worms
will come upon them. They did so. The Félistinéada triumphed
again; they placed wooden spears on the necks of the heroes they
killed, and worms came on the heads.’

Page 62 of 72
No comment. Except one: the medieval copyists added ‘by their sorcery’ whereas
in Greek and Scythian antiquity, sorcerers did not exist. One can speak of a lack of
fair play towards druidism.
Obviously, this triggered the anger of the Philistines against the Scythians. And to
avoid the massacre, the future Tuatha De fled and wandered and finally reached
the north of Albania where they stayed for seven years. Then they decided to head
for Ireland and seemed aware that they would have to contend with the Fir Bolg.
The Book says nothing about their sea voyage but states that the wife of Nuadu,
ruler of the Tuatha De, was called Tailltiu and that she was the daughter of the
‘king’ of Spain, Mag Mor. This suggests that the Tuatha De had stopped in Spain
before heading to Ireland.
Of course, the confrontation with the Fir Bolg raged on and the Tuatha De came
out on top with heavy losses. Nuadu even had his hand cut off, so that he could not
exercise sovereignty for seven years. The care of Nuadu is so strange that it is best
to quote the Book:
‘Bress s. Elada took the kingship of Ireland post, to the end of
seven years, till the arm of Nuadu was healed: a silver arm with
activity in every finger and every joint which Dian Cecht put
upon him, Credne helping him. But Miach son of Dian Cecht fixed
joint to joint and vein to vein of his own hand, and it was healed
in thrice nine days; and on that account his silver hand was given
as his guerdon.’
‘Vein to vein’? In modern medicine, this is called a prosthesis.
The Fir Bolg were decimated and the survivors took refuge on ‘remote’ headlands
and islands. It is likely that these Fir Bolg refugees or their descendants, faced with
the limited resources of the headlands and islands, eventually landed on the island
of Britain.

Page 63 of 72
Then the Tuatha De, who were not very combative during their former stay in
Greece, fought over the sovereignty of Ireland. The Book describes these disputes
in detail, but we will limit ourselves to mentioning characters who have passed into
posterity. We begin with Brigit, a goddess of Irish mythology who was a niece of
Nuadu. She was a poet, which in her time was a sign of social success. We then
move on to a little nephew of Nuadu, Mac Cuill. We continue with Lug, known as
the Long Hand. He is a god of Irish mythology. He was the lucky holder of the spear
from the islands north of Greece. He was a nephew of Nuadu and ruled Ireland for
40 years. Then he was killed by Mac Cuill who must have been impatient with Lug’s
longevity.
There remains a point to be clarified: why did Tuatha De reappoint in Tuatha
De Danan? Hypotheses do not miss, including the most picturesque. For example,
according to one of them, the Tuatha De Danan (or Danann) would be one of the
twelve tribes of Israel, that of Dan. However, it was enough to read the Book.
Nuadu had a small niece, Danan, and this last had three girls. The religious prestige
of his three daughters was such as they were high (in their lifetime) at the rank of
goddesses and as they were called Danan. And Tuatha De, people of the goddesses,
became the Tuatha De Danan, the people of the goddesses of Danan.
There is still one point to be clarified: why did the Tuatha De rename themselves
as Tuatha De Danan? There is no shortage of hypotheses, including the most
picturesque. For example, according to one of them, the Tuatha De Danan (or
Danann) would be one of the twelve tribes of Israel, that of Dan. However, it was
enough to read the Book. Nuadu had a great-niece, Danan, and she had three
daughters. The religious prestige of her three daughters was such that they were
elevated (during their lifetime) to the rank of goddesses and were called the Danan.
And the Tuatha De, people of the goddesses, became the people of the goddesses
of Danan.
We shall conclude with a strange passage from the Book. In the nineteenth century,
the Irish Academy deleted this passage but Trinity College retained it.
(Ó Cléirigh only, free translation from Lizeray’s text) ’Tethor the
distinguished who discovered mead, brave was the man. The

Page 64 of 72
hazel tree was the god of the grandson of the Dagda who was not
black, Banba was his wife.’
Let us first identify the characters. Tethor was a brother of Mac Cuill and had the
nickname ‘Son of the Hazel Tree’, because he worshipped this tree (…) Eochu,
nicknamed the Dagda, was Tethor’s grandfather. And now we come to the most
surprising term: the Dagda was not ‘black’. Black of skin? It wouldn’t be so
surprising, because according to the Book, the Scythians had settlements south of
the Red Sea and these settlements had good relations (even marriage ties) with the
Egyptian elite and its pharaohs. And historians know that some pharaohs and
dignitaries were black.

Page 65 of 72
Ireland (countryside)
Photo: Bayawe | Pixabay
Gaedil
We end up with the Gaedil, better known as Gaels. This was also a Scythian
population, but unlike the others, they were not descended from the ancestor
Aitech but from his brother Baath. We are talking about the 25th generation from
that of Baath. They are descendants of a long dynasty of Scythian rulers, going back
to the ruler Nenual, brother of Nel, whose history we have already mentioned.
They are less gifted in ‘science’ than the Tuatha De but they are fearsome warriors.
We begin with the 300 years before their arrival in the land of Ireland. The story
starts with the 12th generation and more specifically, with two sons of a Scythian
ruler: Allot and Lamfhind. When the story begins, they are on the Caspian Sea,
then sail to the Libyan Sea and land on a ‘pleasant’ island called Cercina
(Kerkennah Islands, Tunisia). They stayed there for a little over a year.
When they were on the Caspian Sea, they were confronted with ‘mermaids’. The
Book considers these creatures as ‘beasts’ but their description is worth a look:

Page 66 of 72
(Ó Cléirigh only, free translation from Lizeray’s text) ‘They had
above the navel a prodigiously beautiful woman’s body, a
gorgeous woman’s face, and, on their heads, blond hair that fell
lower than their shoulders …; fish they were from the navel to the
tip.’
But there is a less attractive element: they were carnivores.
After this journey, their druid, Caicher, makes a prophecy: the Gaels will reach the
island of Ireland in … 300 years. After their relatively short stay on the island of
Cercina, they settled in the country of the Macotic Marshes (?), whose sovereignty
they consolidated until the 21st generation. Then the Gaels set sail again. Their
leader at the time was called Brat. They settled in Spain and fought against the
Toisions (Greeks?), the Bachra (?) and the Lombards. The presence of the
Lombards, originally from Scandinavia, in Spain at this time is surprising. On the
other hand, the presence of Greeks would be less surprising: they had supplanted
the Phoenicians in Spain. Then the Book states that the next generation of Gaels
subdued ‘all the clans of Spain’ (which is probably an exaggeration).
This generation (the 22nd), conquerors of Spain, with the ruler Bregon at its head,
built their capital and named it Brigantia. It is easy to identify where this Brigantia
is, because when the Romans invaded Spain, they renovated an old city and gave
it the name of Brigantium (present-day A Coruña). The 23rd and 24th generations
were uninterested in Ireland (and even seemed to have forgotten its existence).
One of the leaders of the 24th generation, Galam, decided to make a voyage to
Scythia, the land of his ancestors, which he had never visited. His fleet consisted
of forty ships (between two thousand four hundred and four thousand people). He
sailed beyond the maritime limits of Galian (the name of the country of the Gaels
in Spain?), via the columns of Hercules (Gibraltar) and Sicily.
In Scythia, Galam was so well received that he became the son-in-law of the
Scythian ruler of the time, Refloir. But Galam became so popular that Refloir took
offence and challenged him to a duel. A duel that proved fatal for the ruler. As a

Page 67 of 72
result, the Scythian dignitaries banished Galam. He had to abandon his wife but
was allowed to take his two sons with him. And the Gaels set sail again with their
ships.
Direction… Egypt. The pharaoh of the time, Nectanebo (Lizeray’s Nectonibus),
received him warmly. It must be said that Galam was a descendant of the Scythian
Nel who had married Scota, the daughter of an ancient pharaoh. Galam received
land and even the hand of one of the daughters of Nectanebo. In memory of the
ancient Scota, the Gaels gave Galam’s wife the same name: Scota. After a stay of
unspecified length, Galam decided to return to Spain and took Scota with him.
Before reaching Spain, he stayed with the Macotic Marshes. It is known that the
Gaels had secured sovereignty over these Marshes, but the Book does not give
details of the native population.
Finally, having followed (or taken back up) the Rhine, followed Gaul (Gaul), etc.
Galam is back in the Marshes and decides to go back to Spain. He discovers
Brigantia, a city which is not any more at the hands of Gaels. He dispels the
population of the city and takes back the control of the region. Of course, Bracas
and Lombards try again. And they have new allies: Chartered them out (Friesians?)
Galam wins all battles and restores the sovereignty of Gaels. And the population,
as a sign of recognition, will call him Galam Miledh. According to Lizeray, Miledh
would have a signification identical to Latin ‘militis’ (serviceman). Historians use
the nickname Miledh (or derivatives as Mil or Milesius) for the name Galam.
Finally, after having travelled along (or up) the Rhine, along Gaul, etc., Galam
returns to the Marshes and decides to return to Spain. There he discovers a city of
Brigantia which is no longer in the Gaels hands. He drives the population out of
the city and regains control of the region. Of course, the Bracas and the Lombards
come back. And they have new allies: the ‘Frétions’ (Friesians?). Galam wins all
the battles and re-establishes the sovereignty of the Gaels. His people, as a sign of
gratitude, will call him Galam Miledh. According to Lizeray, Miledh would have an
identical meaning to the Latin ‘militis’ (military person). Historians use the
nickname Miledh (or derivatives such as Mil or Milesius) for the name Galam.

Page 68 of 72
The last two sons of Galam were born in Spain and were called Erimon (Ó
Cléirigh’s Ereamon) and Erannan. Then Galam died of the ‘plague’ and so never
set foot on Irish soil. The Book states that the Gaels had so lost sight of Ireland that
it will take a sign of fate for the three-century-old prophecy of the druid Caicher to
be fulfilled. During a ‘clear winter’, a great-uncle of Erimon, Brega, thought he saw
‘a country and a beautiful island’. It is certain that the site of La Coruña is at the
same latitude as the island of Ireland, but it is still a little far. On the strength of
this vision, Brega prepares a fleet, even if relatives try to dissuade him.
Finally, Brega will set foot on Irish soil but the Tuatha De chiefs will not spare him.
And it is to avenge his great-uncle that Erimon/Ereamon will land in Ireland. He
never set foot in Spain again and became King of Ireland. It is said that the name
of present-day Ireland, Eire, derives from the prefix of his first name: ‘Ere’. But the
suffix ‘amon’ also attracts attention. Amon was the god of the city of Thebes in
Egypt and Erimon’s mother was called Scota, the Egyptian.
To conclude, given that the ancient language of the Irish and Scots is Gaelic, what
would be the fundamental difference between the Irish and the Scots? There are
several clues in the Book that suggest that some present-day Scottish clans
originated from ancient Tuatha De clans.

Page 69 of 72
Conclusion
Through these five invasions of Ireland, some questions arise about certain nations
of ancient Europe. For example, during his journey through Europe, why did
Galam Miledh not come across any Germen or Celts? Historians do not rule out
the fact that Germen may be descendants of Scythians. But did they come from the
East (the continent) or the West (the British Isles)?
It is remembered that after the last battle between the Nemedians and the
Fomoraig, there were thirty survivors. Then, they divided themselves into three
groups, specifying that one of the three took the direction of the island of Britain
(Great Britain). The Book mentions (twice) the names of the thirty but without
specifying their distribution in the three groups. But after mentioning the leader
of the first group, Erglan, three names follow. Then after mentioning the leader of
the second group, Britan, fifteen names follow. Finally, after naming the leader of
the third group, Simeon, there are nine names left. The Book states that each group
consisted of ten people but this is not consistent with the way the sequence of
leaders and names is presented.
The group we are interested in is the Britan group which will be heading for the
island of Britain. In this group, we find a member called German. As the
populations of the time used to name themselves after a common ancestor, we can
wonder if German is the ancestor of the Germen. In the same vein, the name of the
Brittons, an ancient population of the northern coast of the European continent,
could be a reference to Britan. These Brittons should not be confused with the
Bretons.
Historians know that the Celts are descendants of Cimmerians from the Black Sea.
They are also Indo-Europeans, but they did not have relations with the Scythians.
The Greek historian Herodotus mentions them in his book at a time in their history
when the Scythians were about to overwhelm them (we are around 600 BC). And
they make the decision to migrate westwards up the Danube. Herodotus describes
the debate among the Cimmerians between those who wanted to stay and those
who wanted to leave. Today, historians know that they settled first on the territory
of present-day Romania and then on the Danube Plain.

Page 70 of 72
Finally, a third wave of Cimmerians emigrated even further west to the territory
between the Paris Basin and the Alps. And these third wave Cimmerians called
themselves the Kelti (Celts). It should be remembered that for the Romans, the
Celts were one of the three populations of Gaul. The other two were the Belgians
and the Aquitanians (Basques).
That said, everything indicates that Galam did not go to the Danube Plain and the
German-Polish plain. And that he only went along Gaul. At that time, the
population density of the Celts must not have been high. And the Germen were not
necessarily deployed in the German-Polish plain. For example, geologists know
that this plain was still below sea level 10,000 years ago. And we can assume that
it was still swampy 2,500 years ago. Moreover, during Galam’s journey, the Book
mentions the great northern ocean, and if it is the North Sea, we could deduce that
this sea was larger than today.

Page 71 of 72
Author: Julien Tromeur | Pixabay
Epilogue
Let us say that we are Scythian Gaels around 600 BC. We come from Gaelic
colonies in the Mediterranean region. We go up the Rhone (through Provence) and
then settle. Later, according to Herodotus, merchants from the Greek colony of
Massilia visit us on our territory. They did not understand our language but we
wanted to mark our territory: ‘this is the home of the Gaels’. In 600 BC, how can
we say that in Gaelic?

Page 72 of 72
So there are three possibilities: Goídel teg, Gàidheil taigh (pronounced ‘kail taye’)
or Gaeil teach. When we hear a new language, the tones are never familiar. In
ancient Greek, the pronunciation of Keltoi is ‘kail tial’, which is very close to the
pronunciation of Gàidheil taigh. In other words, the etymology of Celt could be
based on a … misunderstanding.

Origins of the Celts: As you have never read them before!

More Related Content

What's hot (17)

Similar to Origins of the Celts: As you have never read them before! (20)

More from Hervé Cariou (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Origins of the Celts: As you have never read them before!